  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
4 edits | Wimax competitor?
A potential Wimax competitor but with a lot of variables still unannounced. The article never says what frequencies are being piggybacked on. They deny interference, but using the same frequency as other products implies a possible interference issue.
It all sounds very promising, but it will be months and months before anything shows up in something other than prototypes and independent testing is commenced.
Edit: Here is a link that goes into greater detail on the technical aspects of the proposed system: »www.techworld.com/mobility/featu···eID=1570
xMax uses one narrowband channel, but sends more data than could possibly be fitted into that channel - and yet it does not break the laws of physics, claims Bobier. The narrowband channel does not carry the payload, it is just used to co-ordinate and synchronise the sender and receiver. The information is then transmitted in a wideband signal (which xG calls a Flash Signal), at very low power.
"Our technology uses a narrowband channel, and places a carrier there for an extremely precise clock in the receiver," says Bobier. "The transmitter also transmits information in side bands, at levels lower than ultra-wideband. We are able to get performance comparable to a wideband licensed trasmission."
The data is sent out-of-band, but at power levels that are lower than those permitted for unintentional out-of-band signals by normal transmitters. "The levels of out-of-band emissions are highly regulated," says Bobier. "Ours are even lower."
The synchronisation allows the receiver to pick out signals below the noise floor, claims Bobier, so a signal that is not registered by other spectrum users, can be picked up by the intended recipient. There is some explanation in a FAQ at xG, and an article in Microwave Engineering.
...less than one Watt, using the unlicensed 900MHz ISM band..
Here is a link to the companies web site:
»www.xgtechnology.com/news.htm
-- My Web Page Join Red Room Forum |
|
  Topmounter Sent By Grocery Clerks
join:2001-02-20 Evergreen, CO | hhmm, this and p2p file sharing software should make a great match  |
|
  Chaoswar Premium join:2002-09-23 Northlake IL | Neat
I see how this also would be great in places like a hospital where interference is a big issue. What I really think sells this is how much less power it takes to run. The impact of that alone would make this "technology" gold. |
|
  Guspaz Guspaz Premium,MVM join:2001-11-05 Montreal, QC
·Colbanet
| This is just UWB
This seems virtually identical to Ultra Wideband, which works by sending signals accross large swaths of the spectrum. The reason that UWB doesn't cause interference is because it sends over such a large part of the spectrum. Imagine looking at a puddle. Say it's windy and the puddle is covered in ripples. Then say a drop of water fell in. You wouldn't notice it because it would be lost in the ripples. However if a thousand tiny drops of water fell in the puddle, you could see the pattern.
Same idea with UWB. On a narrow frequency, an UWB signal is invisible because it's such low power. But when you look at many frequencies, that small signal becomes an obvious pattern; the same tiny change in all the frequencies is easy to pick out.
So, again, this guy's tech seems to be just UWB. |
|
  Andrew J Premium join:2001-11-09 Lancaster, PA clubs: | I agree and it's been around for 16 years. |
|
 bandman0
join:2003-07-25 Parkersburg, WV
| This guy (Joe Bobier)'s last "technological marvel invention" was using off the shelf bridgecom radios to deliver broadband to end users by placing APs on radio towers. It worked marginally, though the company (iDigi) went out of business. A child company (Wirefire) is still in business, though the equipment is very old and prone to failure.
I only post to this dead discussion since this "new" wireless technology was recently referenced in a Slashdot article. |
|