Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » .0005 Watt Wireless
Search Topic:
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2005-11-04 15:38:13: A company by the name of xG technology says they've developed a new wireless signal technique named xMax, that combines Ultra-Wideband with traditional technology, and functions on .0005 watts of power (2000 times less power than a 802. ..

page: 1 · 2 · 3
AuthorAll Replies


Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
Actually

Standard 802.11b access points use 100 to 200 milliwatts, not 1 watt.

So that is like, .0001 or .0002 watts right?

It's 1 watt EIRP that they are limited to.

RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
·XMission

.5 milliwatt?

Is that at one frequency or spread out over a spectrum? MY 1 mw 916.5 MHz weather station transmitter has a hard time getting 100 feet through the walls. Wonder what type of beam forming they are using? 1 degree beams?
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.

phuntism

join:2003-08-01
Manhattan Beach, CA

The lower radiation the better I guess

I know it's not a big deal, and that 1 watt is extremely low compared to an 1100 watt microwave oven, but considering many people these days spend most of their lives within range of one or many access points, I'll welcome less radiation. Now if they could just do the same for cell phones


BlaZeR2

join:2001-05-28
Taylor, MI
reply to Matt
Re: Actually

Actually, I believe 100 or 200 milliwatts, is more like .1 watt or .2 watts. Since 1 milliwatt is .001. so 100 x .001 = .1

Someone please correct me if I am wrong.


Maarvin
Premium
join:2005-04-11
Denver, CO
reply to Matt
I believe that they want to go to .5 milliwatt. This is a ridiculously low power output. Something doesn't seem right here. Perhaps these power ratings are all typo's.


Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

reply to BlaZeR2
said by BlaZeR2 See Profile :

Actually, I believe 100 or 200 milliwatts, is more like .1 watt or .2 watts. Since 1 milliwatt is .001. so 100 x .001 = .1

Someone please correct me if I am wrong.
You are correct, Google to the rescue!

»www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&···in+watts


JamesPC

join:2005-10-12
Orange, CA
More than a Mile?

I currently use Wifi at my house and i get about .5 mile away. Does xmax technology expand the wireless range?


David
No,there is another.
Premium,VIP
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL
clubs:
·DIRECTV
·magicjack.com
·AT&T Midwest

It's using

VHF, it's using a TV spectrum that has probably not been really used in more than a decade. I don't think many devices are there except some 900Mhz cordlesses, maybe some 47Mhz cordlesses, and the like. I don't think in the UHF/VHF frequencies there is much going on right?

Please correct me if I am wrong.
--
If you have a topic in the direct forum please reply to it or a post of mine, I get a notification when you do this. Koetting Ford, Granite City, illinois... YOU'RE FIRED!!

clickie

join:2005-05-22
Monroe, MI

You are hereby notified that you are wrong and corrected.

VHF contains numerous services including public service, GMRS, the reviled ham radio band, broadcast, remote telemetry and tons other.

UHF is full of land mobile services, as well as the above. It is very very busy.

See for yourself here:

»www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/allochrt.pdf


David
No,there is another.
Premium,VIP
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL
clubs:
Thank you, I kept thinking it was a somewhat open frequency range..

I had a feeling I was wrong.

Thanks..

clickie

join:2005-05-22
Monroe, MI

1999 Called...

...and it wants its outrageous and bogus claims with its associated white elephants back.

Here's the rub; in order to have that kind of bandwidth at such a low power, the instantaneous power at any given point in the modulated spectrum will require incredibly sensitive receivers. Those are not built with common parts. Furthermore, to be that wide and that sensitive makes them very prone to interference; either fundamental or mixing products. Solving that also isn't very simple nor very cheap.

It might work at ranges of a mile out in a cornfield in Nebraska. Definetly not going to happen in New York city.

lawrence171
Evilly Yours - Evilness

join:2001-12-24
Canada

reply to phuntism
Re: The lower radiation the better I guess

said by phuntism See Profile :

I know it's not a big deal, and that 1 watt is extremely low compared to an 1100 watt microwave oven, but considering many people these days spend most of their lives within range of one or many access points, I'll welcome less radiation. Now if they could just do the same for cell phones
CDMA technologies. Get urself a nice Verizon or Sprint wireless service.
--
What I used to be I no longer am... God, why can't you freeze time for my sake?


hurleyp

join:2000-06-20
Ottawa, ON
reply to Maarvin
Re: Actually

I agree. There seems to be something fishy about a power output claim that is so small that it sounds more theoretical than measurable.
--
"I reject your reality and substitute my own."


FLECOM
Bay Networks Freak
Premium
join:2003-03-03
Miami, FL
reply to clickie
Re: It's using

GMRS/FRS is UHF

MURS is vhf
--
BellSouth sucks


FLECOM
Bay Networks Freak
Premium
join:2003-03-03
Miami, FL


1 edit
reply to David
actually VHF/UHF is pretty congested in most areas, 900mhz is not VHF btw...

800~900 is extremely congested with commercial and public safety systems, 800 especially (thanks nextel!)... uhf is mostly land mobile radio systems like taxi companies and lots of public safety also... things like FRS/GMRS are also in UHF...
--
BellSouth sucks


FLECOM
Bay Networks Freak
Premium
join:2003-03-03
Miami, FL

reply to clickie
Re: 1999 Called...

i agree, they are doing .0005 watts on vhf... i key my 6w vhf handheld and blast everyone offline for miles?

i dunno it just dosent really add up... i dont doubt you can go miles with .0005w of VHF, providing you have very directional/parabolic antennas or something...
--
BellSouth sucks

clickie

join:2005-05-22
Monroe, MI
reply to FLECOM
Re: It's using

I can never keep any of that stuff straight.


Jeffrey
too dark too early
Premium
join:2002-12-24
Dix Hills,NY
clubs:
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FIOS
·Vonage
·magicjack.com


2 edits
1.21 "jigowatts"

I'm anxiously awaiting reports that someone successfully built and tested the flux capacitor.

Edit: Apparently it's "capacitor" not "capacitator". Syllables got the best of me that time.


pokesph
It Is Almost Fast
Premium
join:2001-06-25
Sacramento, CA
clubs:
reply to FLECOM
Re: 1999 Called...

or I key my 150 watt 150 Mhz mobile and bam the whole city's down..
this really sounds too fishy for my tastes..

itguy05

join:2005-06-17
Camp Hill, PA
reply to lawrence171
Re: The lower radiation the better I guess

quote:
CDMA technologies. Get urself a nice Verizon or Sprint wireless service.
Why? They transmit ALL THE TIME vs GSM which transmits in bursts.
Forums » .0005 Watt Wirelesspage: 1 · 2 · 3


Wednesday, 02-Dec 18:29:10 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF