 raye Premium join:2000-08-14 Orange, CA
| ZoneAlarm has worked well for me for almost 7 years
Got the free one back in 1999, moved to pro version in 2001. All my home and small business boxes use ZP Pro and have had no issues with it. It even works on my Windows 2003 boxes, even though ZoneAlarm officially doe snot support it.
Pro seems to be the best deal IMHO. Kapersky is better for AV, so their security suite version is not worth it for me. |
|
  SNT Premium join:2002-07-17 Satellite Beach, FL | I like ...
iptables
-SNT |
|
  Cheese Premium join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL clubs: | Firewall?
I don't need no stinking firewall! |
|
  GilbertMark Premium join:2001-05-02 Gilbert, AZ | Hmm
Little Snitch |
|
 whocares Premium join:2003-07-26 ..
1 edit | reply to raye ZA free, WOW, thats got me worried NOW,
WOW after seeing the test results, »www.firewallleaktester.com/tests.php al this time i thought I was "protected ok with the za free firewall, now I'am going to d/l the "K", and try that one, & see how it works, "jazzy" p.s. according to that poll/results even micro win firewalled failed miserbally. -- I try to be friends with everyone,wary of a few, & will always be an enemy to some reguardless of what we do
|
|
 whocares Premium join:2003-07-26 .. 1 edit | reply to raye oops
sorry |
|
 whocares Premium join:2003-07-26 .. | double post |
|
  Heterman Premium join:2004-02-28 Fayetteville, AR | What do you need extra for?
Linksys router, Windows XP firewall on.
I don't see all the need for the extra stuff. |
|
  Derspankster Premium join:2003-02-12 Marion, OH
·RoadRunner Cable
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by Heterman :Linksys router, Windows XP firewall on. I don't see all the need for the extra stuff. Me either. I've been running 4 boxes on a network that way for quite some time now. No problems what-so-ever. -- I thought I made a mistake once but I was wrong |
|
  wriley I'M Sick Of Fixing Your Computer. Premium join:2001-08-30 Edmonton, AB clubs:  
| Yeah I never run anything more than the windows firewall. Im not sure what the point of any of that test are. Why the hell would I be worried about outbound traffic. As long as my system has no viruses and spyware Im fine. Once a program gets onto your system no ammount of outbound protection is going to help your messed up computer. |
|
  aurgathor
join:2002-12-01 Lynnwood, WA | Tiny here
Tiny firewall on PC (mostly for outbound control), plus a NAT router. |
|
  Doci Toothless Fairy
join:2003-02-01 | No software will compensate for the idiot factor
I run Competent User v0.999.999 on Slackware 10.2
Hasn't failed me once. -- My freedom is a debt to Hitler. |
|
  Heterman Premium join:2004-02-28 Fayetteville, AR
| reply to wriley Re: What do you need extra for?
said by wriley : Why the hell would I be worried about outbound traffic. As long as my system has no viruses and spyware Im fine. Once a program gets onto your system no ammount of outbound protection is going to help your messed up computer. My thoughts exactly. If it can't get in, then how's it gonna send stuff out? People need to be more cautious of what emails they open and where they browse. Maybe they should consider getting a decent AV software. |
|
  wriley I'M Sick Of Fixing Your Computer. Premium join:2001-08-30 Edmonton, AB clubs:  
| reply to Heterman Yeah a good brain and or some good antivirus software is all that is ever needed, because as soon as you have one peice or software on your system that can get out, it doesnt matter what firewall you have blocking outbound traffic. The software is already in and can delete your data, corrupt your os, uninstall software, email your info off the system using your browser or email software (by passing your firewall) I think that test is really misleading. |
|
  99664227 Heavily MODerated Premium join:2002-11-21 USA
| reply to Cheese Re: Firewall?
said by Cheese :I don't need no stinking firewall! True Dat! -- Market go up. Market go down. |
|
  PayneEnter Premium join:2005-09-11 Oakland, CA
| reply to Heterman Re: What do you need extra for?
I use two Linksys routers(wired/wireless)and Windows XP firewall on with 18 systems sharing the same connection. Never had a virus or hacker activity  |
|
  GlenQuagmire Giggidy Giggidy Giggidy Goo Premium join:2004-02-16 Grand Rapids, MI
| Fedora Core
My favorite would have to be Fedora Core with iptables. Its cheap and I can configure to do what every I want. Also, the school district I work for is upgrading all of it w98 machines to wXP I have access to tons of Pentium 2 which run iptables great. I hate running my firewall at my desktop, I really don't want lots of programs loading at startup. |
|
  KeepOnRockin Music Lover Forever Premium join:2002-11-08 Beaverton, OR
·Comcast
| reply to Doci Re: No software will compensate for the idiot factor
said by Doci :I run Competent User v0.999.999 on Slackware 10.2Hasn't failed me once. I guess that means most non DSLR members are running Incompetent User v0.999.999 on Windows XP  |
|
  wriley I'M Sick Of Fixing Your Computer. Premium join:2001-08-30 Edmonton, AB clubs:   | reply to Heterman Re: What do you need extra for?
My home is on a linksys router with only winxp firewalls and Iv never had a problem either. And my portable is not even behind a router most of the time and has never had any issues. |
|
  crypto7ogic
join:2001-08-29 Dayton, OH clubs:
| reply to GilbertMark Re: Hmm
said by GilbertMark :Little Snitch Try NetBarrier... has the outgoing functionality of LS plus a lot more. |
|