Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » RIAA Targets YouTube
Search Topic:
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2006-06-14 18:47:09: The RIAA & MPAA are taking a strong interest in YouTube videos of copyrighted content the past few months, judging from activity in our forums. ..

page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6
AuthorAll Replies


LiberalKing
Intocable
Premium
join:2005-09-12
Bronx, NY

2 edits
FIRST POST

FVCK THE RIAA

those creeps deserve a tube shove-up their anus


crashovrride
Premium
join:2003-08-05
Oakdale, PA
Re: FIRTS POST

Right on!

zipjay

join:2003-03-11
Louisville, KY

oh brother

ohh brother! before you know it their gonna sue people who make home videos where people just so happen to be playing a copyrighted song on a stereo or something in the background..

what everyone needs to start doing is stop using RIAA songs for anything and use indie music


roamer1
sticking it out at you

join:2001-03-24
Atlanta, GA
clubs:

 In the RIAA's view...

someone posting a video of their kid's birthday party would be subject to getting a letter (thanks to the fact that "Happy Birthday" remains copyrighted because of the absurd extension of copyright that Disney and the Bonos pushed for.) I wonder if THAT's happened yet...

-SC
--
"it seems like all you ever buy is Abercrombie and cell phones" --a friend


tsu9

join:2001-08-17
Wheeling, IL
Sickening.

It's always a pleasure to see an entity destroy fan-made homages.

I dare presume that the RIAA and MPAA simply do not want "fans" or customers.

grandpinaple

join:2006-01-03
New York, NY
Of course not you silly sally...
.
.
.
.
.
.
They want consumers.

zipjay

join:2003-03-11
Louisville, KY
reply to tsu9
nope they just want everyone to buy the music, let noone hear it, copy it, duplicate it, enjoy it, or borrow it........ unless you pay them.


yaplej
CCNA
Premium
join:2001-02-10
White City, OR
·Charter Pipeline

You owe us

Soon the RIAA/MPAA is going to try and bill us if we happen to hear/see copyrighted material being played in someone else’s (insert audio/vidio playing device here).

They will expect everyone to wear earplugs/eye covers 24x7 in order to avoid being prosecuted for illegally listening to copyrighted material.

Then they will shove tubes down our throat, directly interface to our brain, and plunge us into bathtubs full of thermal collecting goop, while we slip into a virtual world of their design, and control.

Ok so maybe not that last part just yet.


phxmark
What Country Are We Living In?

join:2000-12-27
Glendale, AZ

said by yaplej See Profile :

Soon the RIAA/MPAA is going to try and bill us if we happen to hear/see copyrighted material being played in someone else’s (insert audio/vidio playing device here).

They will expect everyone to wear earplugs/eye covers 24x7 in order to avoid being prosecuted for illegally listening to copyrighted material.

Then they will shove tubes down our throat, directly interface to our brain, and plunge us into bathtubs full of thermal collecting goop, while we slip into a virtual world of their design, and control.

Ok so maybe not that last part just yet.
Enter The Matrix.
--
High speed is dangerous. Too many MP3s, not enough time.


rob_in_chatt
Premium
join:2004-09-17
Chattanooga, TN
f*cking morons

i heard the guy next to me at a stoplight playing Eminem on his readio.............can i sue for that too?

tthnow

join:2006-06-07
Oakland, CA
RIAA is a joke

What a freaking joke.....get a life!


PlagueX1
Plague

join:2004-08-27
Twining, MI

stupid

They are serously going beyond here. I can see the P2P network sharing of copyright content, but through videos? This is starting to get serously disgusting...
--
Westell ADSL Modem|Linksys WRT54GS Router|1mb DL->356kb UP|»astroplague.blogspot.com


insomniac84

join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN

reply to yaplej
Re: You owe us

No they will force you to declare the situations in which you want to play music at any time and estimate how many people will be able to hear it. Then make you pay a fee for every person. So listening with head phones will be a couple of bucks , and listening on a boom box at the beach will cost a few thousand dollars.


Plowmac

@hemotorenwerke.com

Seem to be going too far here

Yea, I do agree they seem to be going too far here. I do understand how things are copyrighted, but to punish people using a medium to express their love for a paticular song is pretty rediculous. Especially since its a medium where you can not download any of the content (its in a somewhat protected format)....and the fact that it isnt being sold either. They are just trying to alienate everyone.


reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL

reply to LiberalKing
Re: FIRST POST

said by LiberalKing See Profile :

FVCK THE RIAA

those creeps deserve a tube shove-up their anus
Why not a retractable baton?


fonzbear2000
Premium
join:2005-08-09
Saint Paul, MN

reply to zipjay
Re: oh brother

said by zipjay See Profile :

ohh brother! before you know it their gonna sue people who make home videos where people just so happen to be playing a copyrighted song on a stereo or something in the background..
re-read the article and you will see that this is already being done:
"Project Opus claims the warnings are even being applied to videos of amateur dancers who are getting their groove on to copyrighted music."
--
comcast high speed subscribers: »[Newsgroups] use up ur monthly 2gb limit? try this!

bgraham

join:2001-03-15
Smithtown, NY
·Verizon FIOS


2 edits
Look on the good side

Due to all of the publicity, 90% of internet users now know exactly where to get their free music.

Why don't we ever hear the RIAA talk about Usenet?

I presume that because of the RIAA a London UK radio station that I used to listen to Heart 102.6 has stopped broadcasting to USA IP addresses. Personally I feel quite disgusted about that situation. If I was stinking rich I might feel like starting a law suit over the situation. Listening to a radio staion over the internet is not even closely related to selling or trading songs on the internet. My listening is not reducing royalty to any artist by 1 cent.

Radio waves (at least short wave) reach the USA from all sorts of other countries so maybe the RIAA will get foreign stations to reduce their power if their radio waves are reaching the USA


GilbertMark
Premium
join:2001-05-02
Gilbert, AZ
·Cox HSI

Why don't the look at IRC as long as they're looking at Usenet? Does this ancient technology completely baffle the cavemen running this organization.
--
Got a V3? Want to get the most out of it? Check out my site »hacktheV3.com


Jameson
10-8
Premium
join:2004-05-28
Fallbrook, CA
clubs:
This is getting fucking out of control. We need to get rid of the RIAA and the MPAA, its the people gov right?


King P
Don't blame me. I voted for Ron Paul
Premium
join:2004-11-17
Inman, SC
·Windstream
·Charter Pipeline

my RIAA rant

The RIAA seems to forget that amateurs dancing to copyrighted music is perfectly legal, under fair use laws. The amateurs in question are not SELLING their videos and trying to make a profit, so therefore the RIAA legally can not do anything about it. This would change if the dancers had an ad at the end of their video promoting their pay site or whatever, that would then be a violation of copyright law.

Of course when you have Congress in your pocket, you can pretty well do whatever you want, regardless of what the Constitution says...
Forums » RIAA Targets YouTubepage: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6


Saturday, 28-Nov 15:03:13 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF