site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
view: topics flat text 
Post a:
Comments on news posted 2006-06-26 10:45:50: The Mercury News has more on AT&T being forced by regulators to offer "naked" DSL in California, yet charging almost the same for it as they did for DSL and local phone service. "The choice for the customer is whether you want to pay AT&T $45 or .. ..

  TopicReplies/uniqsLast Post
 Hmm 29.99 a montn with Skype by MTBikerChris14/433removed : 27th Jun 2006
 verizon about a year ago in pittsburgh area by vhm_14u2c-/5527th Jun 2006
 I got your naked DSL right here! by nasadude8/324patcat88 : 26th Jun 2006
Drop POTS to save $3; no thanks by fAcEtIOUs2/133fAcEtIOUs : 26th Jun 2006
 The real reason "Naked" is far more expensive by dru-/6426th Jun 2006
 The Naked Truith by richardpor3/126richardpor : 26th Jun 2006
 How Come Verizon Can do it for the same PRICE? by Liars-/5026th Jun 2006
 pay $45 or $45 by markrubi2/87fiberguy : 26th Jun 2006
 AT&T being forced by regulators to offer "naked" DSL by MTBikerChris4/153removed : 26th Jun 2006
 What do you expect by Transmaster3/138PDXPLT : 26th Jun 2006
 Let AT&T Screw Itself by pnh102-/7426th Jun 2006
 ... by ftthz-/6026th Jun 2006
 Alltel and Naked DSL by frankenfeet-/7526th Jun 2006
 who was actually surprised by this? by PhoenixDown-/6726th Jun 2006
 "AT&T says..." by dadkins-/7926th Jun 2006
Show topics for: 10 · 30 · 60 · 90 · 180 · 365 · all days.


Saturday, 26-May 17:33:19 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.