Search:  

 
theme to black backgroundlet page decide theme
HomeFind ServiceReviewsISP NewsFAQsForumsToolsDatabaseAbout 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Getting Naked is Expensive in California
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2006-12-21 17:47:02: As a condition of the AT&T and SBC merger, California regulators required that AT&T offer California consumers "naked DSL," or DSL without force-bundled local phone service. ..

  TopicReplies/uniqsLast Post
 Qwest Bundled is worse... by SolarPup-/624th Dec 2006
 California cost of living and reality check. by GhostDoggy4/27GhostDoggy : 24th Dec 2006
 Difference in market, regulatory rules and approach by Kardinal3/44Kardinal : 23rd Dec 2006
Never got the idea of dry dsl by brianiscool6/153Rob : 23rd Dec 2006
 Around these parts... by CylonRed-/1722nd Dec 2006
 It's called "Penalty Pricing" by KrK3/27footballdude : 22nd Dec 2006
 Seems pretty simple by Titus Pullo2/22rahlquist : 22nd Dec 2006
 a result of no competition by DSLTech1/17rahlquist : 22nd Dec 2006
 not the same by DreamWraith7/180DreamWraith : 22nd Dec 2006
 hmmm..... by woody77/96battleop : 21st Dec 2006
 The regulators know they are leaving gaping loopholes by dslextreme-/1121st Dec 2006
 Just "some" markets? by tiger723/38squid7 : 21st Dec 2006
 Yeah... by dadkins2/25squid7 : 21st Dec 2006
Regulators didn't read their own fine print by TKJunkMail4/49ropeguru : 21st Dec 2006
 Reg required by Anonymous-/1721st Dec 2006
 it's the surcharges and fees on the landline by telcogod9-/721st Dec 2006
 Hmmmm by beck-/721st Dec 2006
 well........... by TigerNutz-/921st Dec 2006
Show topics for: 10 · 30 · 60 · 90 · 180 · 365 · all days.
(topic: unread, updated, locked - more icons)


Sunday, 06-Dec 10:49:29 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF