 tmc8080
join:2004-04-24 Floral Park, NY
| in a pigs a** The riaa has lost precedent after precedent on this one.. the only thing they can possibly force these people they sue, is to buy an "all you can eat" download service.. other than that they have NO CASE.. its the only thing reasonable.. and if they're WRONG, they should-- that's right: EAT ALL LEGAL COSTS. | |
|
  dspolk
@shawcable.net | Go Fon! If this pee's the 'x'iaa's off then more power to FON routers  | |
|
 jyc76
join:2006-10-18 Beverly Hills, CA | All those using WEP encryption (everyone in my neighbourhood I wonder if they will be liable too, since it can be hacked into in >5 minutes | |
|
  Stacy5525
@alaweb.com | Re: Next In Line Kinda like holding gun companies responsible for someone using a gun in a crime.... Oh wait they DO that don't they?  | |
|
  RaidioWavs
@alaweb.com | Fight Back Gee, I guess my decision 4 years ago NOT to buy new CD's in protest of the RIAA was a good one. Shop Ebay and used CD stores, people. Screw the RIAA. | |
|
 |   mrchris We don't miss you Bush Premium join:2002-10-01 North Babylon, NY | Re: Fight Back And minor labels.  | |
|
  Michieru2 zzz zzz zzz Premium join:2005-01-28 Miami, FL
| Solution? If the AP is a private AP used for inside a business and authorized user's only then a user should not be held responsible since his connection has been "broken" into.
If it where a public hotspot, more than likely they will have to be responsible for there connection. Meaning when you try now to use that free AP at the local coffee shop you will have to agree to a contract before your allowed access.
On top of that keep a record of those who used the AP and have there laptop serial or MAC address written on the receipt and business copy. So if the cop's come notching on the manager's door he can simply look at the logs and say this data came from such and such customer. Which has there name and showing them that they agreed to use the free AP.
So the company can still provide the service and not held liable for abuser's. Of course let a detective handle this light weight crap. -- The only limits we have are the one's we set ourselves. | |
|
  batterup I Can Not Tell A Lie. Premium join:2003-02-06 Netcong, NJ clubs:
·Verizon Online DSL
1 edit | Could it be that they love money more then what is right? Could it be that they love money more then what is right? What would Jesus do?
| |
|
 |   John Galt Forward, March Premium join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp
·CenturyLink
| Re: Could it be that they love money more then what is right? Try as He might, Jesus just can't get it though their thick skulls... |
Probably this.. -- A is A | |
|
 |  |  Jigglyware Gelatin based computing
join:2006-01-09 Kenosha, WI | Re: Could it be that they love money more then what is right? Naw, man, Jesus was down with the whole p2p thing, remember the loaves and fishes deal? (of course the FIAA [Fishing Industry Association of Arabia] was probably behind the lawsuit that lead to the crucifixion :P) | |
|
  viperpa33s Why Me? Premium join:2002-12-20 Bradenton, FL | Rewrite case law So what the RIAA is saying is, if someone steals your car and uses it to rob a bank, then the person who owns the car is responsible not the person who robs the bank.
Looks like the RIAA is trying to rewrite case law. | |
|
 |  stufried Premium join:2003-10-13
·Verizon BroadbandA..
| Re: Rewrite case law And what happens if you have a US Chrysler Corporation product that is two years old or older. Everyone knows that the security they provide is useless and a punk with a screwdriver can get in and start it in under a minute. There are numerous legal open hotspots.
What up the companies that sell prepaid dialup internet? Shouldn't they be responsible as well?
Viperpa33s asked: "if someone stelas your car and uses it to rob a bank, then the person who owns the car is responsible not the person who robs the bank. " I suspect that the RIAA's position would be that the car owner, the parking lot attendant who didn't catch the thief, and the company which paved the road on you which your stolen car traveled to and from the bank would all be liable as well as the car thief." | |
|
 |
|
 |