republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
view: topics flat text 
Post a:
Comments on news posted 2007-07-02 09:21:10: Frontline, one of several outfits eager to build a national wireless emergency broadband network with 700 MHz spectrum, has challenged Verizon to debate before the FCC. ..


fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

Hundt's isn't answering the questions raised by study

»www.freedomworks.org/informed/is···rontline

No matter who paid for the study, it has made many valid points that Frontline has refused to answer. And Reed Hundt(a Frontline employee) has done nothing to answer those questions. All he has done is trot out the worn out argument that his opponent(a major telco) is against it - so therefore it must be a good plan.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page

Uncle Paul

join:2003-02-04
USA
kudos:1

Re: Hundt's isn't answering the questions raised by study

How do we know this was paid for by Verizon? Just because a link on this website indicating that it was doesn't make it so...
Zoder

join:2002-04-16
Miami, FL

Re: Hundt's isn't answering the questions raised by study

First page of the study.

quote:
BY JEFFREY A. EISENACH, PH.D. †

†Chairman, Criterion Economics and Adjunct Professor, George Mason University Law School. The
author expresses thanks to Joseph Kraemer for helpful suggestions, but takes full responsibility for any errors or omissions. Support for this paper was provided by Verizon Communications. The opinions expressed are my own.
Time4aNAP
Premium
join:2007-04-09
Des Plaines, IL

"Lower taxes, less government, more freedom" my @$$

said by fAcEtIOUs:

No matter who paid for the study, it has made many valid points...
No, it hasn't. In fact its few claims are false and/or misleading.

...that Frontline has refused to answer.
Those questions are nobody's business but Frontline's. What grounds do you have to claim that "Hundt's [sic] isn't answering the questions raised by (the) study"? And why do you feel that Frontline has any obligation to Verizon's hired guns?

Michieru2
zzz zzz zzz
Premium
join:2005-01-28
Miami, FL

....

This idea gives a bad taste in my mouth, something smells rotten and I don't like it.
--
Duct tape, saving lives since 1942.
AMDonUT2004

join:2006-06-12
Bedford, VA

this could work

if they don't like each other, let them fight in jello and put it on live tv

Ream0

@rr.com

WOW! midget wrestling!

...Verizon's got a plan! Screw the consumer any way you can!

With 20% broadband penetration,shouldn't they work on their primary network rather than build a emergency broadband network? I think their funding this with the dubious $2.00/month forced long distance fee.

I wish someone would jamb a phone pole up Seidenberg's ass!

Time4aNAP
Premium
join:2007-04-09
Des Plaines, IL

Question

Why should Verizon, an incumbent telco with no overt plans to suddenly abandon its wire & fiber plant and throw all of its eggs into the wireless broadband basket, have any say in what any wireless broadband company proposes to do? The only possible motive that Verizon could have is anti-competitive and not in the public interest. Why is this even being reported as news?
ltjordan

join:2001-12-02
Hyattsville, MD

Re: Ivan debating.

I'm sure Ivan is going to put that at the top of his "to-do" list.

Saturday, 26-May 21:12:43 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.