  MrMoody But the Grinch ... did Not.
join:2002-09-03 Smithfield, NC | Consumers
Who else do they think is going to pay? Wake up and smell reality. |
|
  jgkolt Premium join:2004-02-21 Lakewood, OH clubs:
1 edit | so this would hamper the small company s from competing against the large business effectively thwarting competition resulting in more of a monopoly style competition.
also seen here
»www.usatoday.com/tech/news/techp···ge_N.htm
-- www.LakeSemaJ.com Help me get free trades.3 free if you sign up, $7 after. PM Me |
|
 CMoore2004 Premium join:2003-02-06 Jonesville, MI
| DOJ?
Who cares what the DOJ thinks? I've hardly seen them dish out any "justice", so perhaps they should shut up about broadband and do what they're supposed to. -- Charter 5M | Windows XP MCE SP2 | Mobile AMD Athlon 64 4000+ | 1.5GB RAM | ATI Mobile Radeon X600 128MB | 120GB HDD |
|
  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| Best points made by Justice
The agency said providing different levels of service is common, efficient and could satisfy consumers. As an example, it cited that the U.S. Postal Service charges customers different guarantees and speeds for package delivery, ranging from bulk mail to overnight delivery.
"Whether or not the same type of differentiated products and services will develop on the Internet should be determined by market forces, not regulatory intervention," the agency said in its filing. It works elsewhere in the business world. So why should the internet get a pass on letting the marketplace decide the rules instead of slow moving ass-backwards regulators? -- -- Internet News My BLOG My Web Page |
|
  roc5955 Premium join:2005-11-26 Rosendale, NY
·RoadRunner Cable
1 edit | reply to jgkolt Re: Consumers
said by jgkolt :so this would hamper the small company s from competing against the large business effectively thwarting competition resulting in more of a monopoly style competition. WTF do you expect from this administration? Do you think they would actually stand up for WE THE PEOPLE, or the corporations?
Something tells me that the DOJ of Bushco, Inc. is going to favor big business EVERY FRIGGIN' TIME!
-- "Understanding is a three-edged sword." |
|
  digitalfreak
join:2005-12-09 49533
2 edits | What BS
The DOJ has no business chiming in on this. It has absolutely nothing to do with them. It's blatantly obvious they're doing it as more payback for AT&T, etc. allowing them to spy on voice and data traffic so easily. Pathetic.
Anybody recall the ending of Tom Clancy's Debt of Honor? I'm thinking it's not such a bad idea. This country needs a mulligan. |
|
  roc5955 Premium join:2005-11-26 Rosendale, NY
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to TKJunkMail Re: Best points made by Justice
said by TKJunkMail :It works elsewhere in the business world. So why should the internet get a pass on letting the marketplace decide the rules instead of slow moving ass-backwards regulators? And the Internet is JUST LIKE the rest of the business world!
NOT! -- "Understanding is a three-edged sword." |
|
  vpoko Premium join:2003-07-03 Jamaica Plain, MA
| reply to TKJunkMail The more relevant question is, "What does this have to do with the department of justice?" And why do you feel like the DOJ should be spending our tax dollars writing these ridiculous press releases that have nothing to do with their core mission of law enforcement. |
|
  sholling Premium join:2002-02-13 Hemet, CA | reply to MrMoody Re: Consumers
I wonder how many "consulting" gigs that piece of propaganda is costing the incumbents. |
|
 fiberguy My views are my own. Premium join:2005-05-20
| reply to CMoore2004 Re: DOJ?
THANK - YOU ! I was reading this tread BEFORE posting your very sentiments... I'm sorry, but we have a body of law makers who we elected and represent us. (well, supposed to at least) and if ANYONE is going to spout up on these issues, it should be the people's representation.. not the DOJ. The DOJ just needs to shut up and dole out the "justice" (sic) in the boundaries of the laws HANDED TO THEM...
I'm sorry, on a side note, it just seems that everyone in government believes they are lawmakers.. last time I checked, our congress made laws... not every other department. -- "Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-serving, the lazy, and Im told its a womans prerogative..." |
|
  vpoko Premium join:2003-07-03 Jamaica Plain, MA | Hey, great, the DOJ
Maybe the FDA would like to chime in, too?
The DOJ should stick to its mandate and stop trying to get in bed with AT&T. |
|
 mobbo
join:2005-04-13 Denton, TX | Remember when?
Remember when the government used to work for The People? Good times. |
|
  woody7 Premium join:2000-10-13 Torrance, CA
·EarthLink
·DSL EXTREME
| reply to roc5955 Re: Consumers
It's not just "this" administration, there are a lot of Dems backing this also, and for full disclosure, I am a Dem. Remember, it's all about the money, everything else is secondary. Peace  -- BlooMe |
|
  roc5955 Premium join:2005-11-26 Rosendale, NY
·RoadRunner Cable
1 edit | I agree it's about the money, but the current morons administration, is surely in favor of it, as some sort of payback, no doubt. Don't forget, Gonzo isn't out the door quite yet. I think he leaves on the 17th.
I am sure that there are some Dems who are all about the money as well. Just as I am sure that there are more than a majority of legislators who haven't a clue as to WTF these "internets" are. -- "Understanding is a three-edged sword." |
|
  vpoko Premium join:2003-07-03 Jamaica Plain, MA
| reply to mobbo Re: Remember when?
said by mobbo :Remember when the government used to work for The People? Nope, and I bet neither do you, that free ride ended long before any of our times - if it ever existed to begin with. Everything looks better in history books. |
|
 nasadude
join:2001-10-05 Rockville, MD
·Comcast
| reply to CMoore2004 Re: DOJ?
this is simply in keeping with the politicization of the entire govt by this administration. since big business is against network neutrality, that means the entire govt is against network neutrality.
wouldn't surprise me if DOD is next to put out a press release speaking against network neutrality.
and if they're still worried, expect one from the State Dept. too. |
|
  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| reply to vpoko Re: Best points made by Justice
said by vpoko :The more relevant question is, "What does this have to do with the department of justice?" And why do you feel like the DOJ should be spending our tax dollars writing these ridiculous press releases that have nothing to do with their core mission of law enforcement. Because Justice decides issues of anti-trust, which comes in to the whole area of whether internet access is a monopoly or not. The Justice Dept says it isn't and therefore regulation isn't needed. -- -- Internet News My BLOG My Web Page |
|
  Maxo Your tax dollars at work. Premium,VIP join:2002-11-04 Tallahassee, FL clubs: | DoJ?
Why is this an issue the DoJ is taking up? |
|
  vpoko Premium join:2003-07-03 Jamaica Plain, MA
| reply to TKJunkMail Re: Best points made by Justice
"Regulation" is defined as administrative law, meaning the Justice Department takes whatever laws Congress passes and implements them through regulations. Net neutrality (which I actually oppose, but that's beside the point) would come into force only if a new law were passed, and it's not the job of the justice department to lobby Congress. |
|
 Just Bob Premium join:2000-08-13 Spring Hill, FL
| reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail : The agency said providing different levels of service is common, efficient and could satisfy consumers. As an example, it cited that the U.S. Postal Service charges customers different guarantees and speeds for package delivery, ranging from bulk mail to overnight delivery.
"Whether or not the same type of differentiated products and services will develop on the Internet should be determined by market forces, not regulatory intervention," the agency said in its filing. It works elsewhere in the business world. So why should the internet get a pass on letting the marketplace decide the rules instead of slow moving ass-backwards regulators? Using the Postal Service as an example? As in first class rate increases to support cheap delivery of junk mail courtesy of the Direct Marketing Association? |
|