Search:  

 
theme to black backgroundlet page decide theme
HomeFind ServiceReviewsISP NewsFAQsForumsToolsDatabaseAbout 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » CT to AT&T: You Need a Cable License
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2007-10-16 09:34:29: AT&T has told communities that their U-Verse VDSL IPTV service technically isn't cable, so it isn't governed by franchise agreements. Towns and cities that challenge this assertion have traditionally been greeted with an AT&T lawsuit. ..

  TopicReplies/uniqsLast Post
 typical spin... (: 1 2 e) by Cod25/279ptrowski : 20th Oct 2007
 Could care less...-/1518th Oct 2007
 U-Verse provides TV service over a private IP network-/2517th Oct 2007
 No Wonder We're Not Tops (: 1 2 e) by pnh10229/1412pnh102 : 17th Oct 2007
 What's the problem?-/2717th Oct 2007
 What's the purpose of the franchise tax? by zackwheat-/2716th Oct 2007
 I find these commments so friggin silly.... by attengineer12/219SD6 : 16th Oct 2007
 cheaper for AT&T to use lawyers.... by morbo14/160bugabuga : 16th Oct 2007
 Cherry picking=MYTH by BF692/60en102 : 16th Oct 2007
 If you don't like it by axus-/1916th Oct 2007
Show topics for: 10 · 30 · 60 · 90 · 180 · 365 · all days.
(topic: unread, updated, locked - more icons)


Sunday, 22-Nov 12:53:08 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF