  ztmikeMark for moderationPremium
join:2001-08-02
Michigan City, IN | AVG I'm using AVG free edition
Is there something better out there thats free? | |
|
 |  backfeedis giving feedback
join:2002-12-16
Peru, IN | Re: AVG I Like AVG...Works for me!!... | |
|
| |
| | | | Re: AVG I can also vouch for Anti-Vir. I've been using it for years on my computer and on the computers of friends and family members. But in the end, it doesn't matter how good or bad, cheap or expensive, your anti-virus software is, it really all depends on the user. Just be careful of what programs you open on your computer and what websites you visit. | |
|
| cbiggers
join:2000-08-10
San Luis Obispo, CA | said by ztmike:I'm using AVG free edition Is there something better out there thats free? AVG is all around very good for a free product. However, the best way to protect yourself from a virus is still the same as it was 10 years ago. Avoid the situation in the first place. Don't open unfamiliar emails, use SBL's in your email, and use DNS blocking/filtering like the Netcraft toolbar or OpenDNS. Don't go looking for cracks on shady websites. Then for the random time you DO encounter a virus, chances are it's something mundane your anti virus or spyware program will pick up. It's really that simple. | |
|
| |  tc1uscg
join:2005-03-09
Saint Clair Shores, MI
2 edits | Re: AVG said by cbiggers:said by ztmike:I'm using AVG free edition Is there something better out there thats free? AVG is all around very good for a free product. However, the best way to protect yourself from a virus is still the same as it was 10 years ago. Avoid the situation in the first place. Don't open unfamiliar emails, use SBL's in your email, and use DNS blocking/filtering like the Netcraft toolbar or OpenDNS. Don't go looking for cracks on shady websites. Then for the random time you DO encounter a virus, chances are it's something mundane your anti virus or spyware program will pick up. It's really that simple. I agree. I hardly use/turn on my PC anymore..  That's a sure way to stay safe.  Now, to be realistic, the majority of users don't have a clue to what your talking about. They come home with a new PC. Almost unable to hook it up and not willing to pay some moron in a white shirt and tie to do it for 100 bucks, they start surfing away. When I get called about a PC running slow from family or a friend, first thing I due is run CLEANUP!. I want to see just what I'm walking into. It amazes me how a PC that's 3 months old can have over a gig of junk from a normal user. So, there will be people willing to shell out 30 or 60 bucks for a suite and feel they are safe and most do a good job keeping them safe if set up correctly. Nothing wrong with that. But, if Symantec, Zonelabs (owned by someone else who will no doubt screw it up) and Mcrappies are failing the grade. Maybe it's time to shut the box of chips down and take the family out to a movie instead of surfing porn.  | |
|
| | | Reviews:
 ·Speakeasy
| Re: AVG This is a big reason why laptops are outselling desktops these days. No cables other than the power cord to connect up. Many of these same people buy a router and become an instant member of what is known as the "Linksys community network".. or the Default community network..  | |
|
|
1 edit | said by ztmike:I'm using AVG free edition Is there something better out there thats free? I switched from AVG to Avast for good a while back. I thought AVG was doing it's job. When trying Avast out on one of my machines when I was bored one day, it found a virus (trojan actually) that AVG had no clue about. That was enough to make me dump AVG for good. I swing by and do an occasional "housecall" also ( »housecall.trendmicro.com/ ), but have never needed to. Avast has done it's job.
I also use Avast frequently when I get an infected computer in for cleaning. The option of a boot time scan is a big plus. AVG was unable to perform a boot time scan last I checked. | |
|
| | bjbrock
join:2002-10-28
Mcalester, OK | Re: AVG I've had AVG find viruses Avast, Nortons and McAfee's all have missed.
When repairing customers PC's, the first thing I do is uninstall their current AV and install AVG. If it's a business machine I make them pay for it. AVG has found viruses left behind by most other AV's. Avast is probably the worst. | |
|
| | |
1 edit | Re: AVG said by bjbrock:I've had AVG find viruses Avast, Nortons and McAfee's all have missed. When repairing customers PC's, the first thing I do is uninstall their current AV and install AVG. If it's a business machine I make them pay for it. AVG has found viruses left behind by most other AV's. Avast is probably the worst. Odd ... I have had the exact opposite experience. I never uninstall their current AV and replace it with Avast without their permission, unless it is another free AV (especially AVG). I will, however, use Avast's boot time scan to clean up what others have missed, even if I leave their current one on the system. Besides the poor detection rate, the lack of a boot time scanner (BIG negative) or the ability to disinfect nested archives keeps me away from AVG. The lack of a boot time scanner alone makes AVG useless in cleaning many strains. There are some viruses that simply cannot be cleaned from within the windows environment.
AVG is actually the worst in most tests (such as this: »wiki.castlecops.com/AntiVirus_Comparison ). I have yet to use AntiVir, so can't vouch for it, but it appears in that test to be the best of the three. My main reason for excluding it is it's lack of a boot scanner. For me and my clients, I will stick with what I know works, and stay away from what I have seen has problems (and lacks needed functionality to fully clean the system).
»www.consumersearch.com/www/softw···iew.html
»www.jhoodsoft.org/av.html | |
|
| | | | | | Re: AVG Avast can't even do autoscheduling. (I wouldn't use any antivirus that can't do that) | |
|
| | | | | | | Re: AVG I've been using AVG for years now and love it. | |
|
| | | | | | | If an AV does it's job on the real time scanners, auto scheduling is useless. I see that as a useless "feature". If the virus isn't detected when it's introduced to the PC, it's probably not going to find it when it run a full scan that is scheduled. FWIW, Avast will constantly run a full scan when the screen saver is active. If "after the fact" scanning is what you prefer to trust, that would find it quicker anyway (of course if it missed it once, it's likely going to miss it again). | |
|
|  jmorlanHmm... That's funny.Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-05
Pacifica, CA
kudos:4 | said by ztmike:I'm using AVG free edition Is there something better out there thats free? For a limited time, you can get AVG Pro version for free. It's a one-year license:
»AVG Anti-Virus 7.5 Professional + Spy Sweeper 5.5 - FREE
It installs fine over your AVG free version. | |
|
| hammerzPremium
join:2000-10-16
Taiwan | Many of the latest reviews give BitDefender the edge these days...and they have a free version. I'm actually using a trial of the paid version right now while I try to make up my mind which way to go. I think I like BDAV very much! And the paid version can be found for less than US$25. It has added protection (real time scanning of files and internet access) that the free version lacks. AVG was pretty far down on the list...like 9th out of 10 top choices, but it was still very good. Another thing I think I'm liking about BDAV is that is has a SUPER small CPU and resource footprint-- which is the reason I just dumped Zonealarm Security Suite. I now use a combination of my router's firewall, Windows Defender, BitDefender, Advanced Windows Protection Pro and Secunia PSI. Oh, yeah, and OpenDNS and Calling ID Link Advisor.
--
Hammerz | |
|
1 edit |  Good article on WHY getting harder to fight malware
For the first time in the history of the Internet we are seeing the establishment of a "virtual" mafia of organized criminals taking advantage of the anonymous nature of the Internet. The unsettling reality is that in today's world the rate of infected users is occurring faster and in greater volume than traditional security companies can detect and respond to. According to the recent quarterly report provided by PandaLabs, the predominant category of malware detected is Trojans (over 75 percent). Trojans are comprised of password stealers, worms, banker Trojans, and various other forms of malicious code. 
The study focused on two very real populations: 1.5 million consumers; and another study against 2,000+ companies. The end result was an astonishing rate of infection - and even though both groups believed they were protected - consumers experienced a 22 percent active infection rate and even more astonishing, 72 percent of those on the corporate side were infected. The malware landscape has changed so quickly that many consumers and companies alike are only just now realizing that the security measures of the past are no longer effective against the new and emerging breed of highly sophisticated malware. Research indicates that the percentage of networks that are infected is much larger than perceived, and certainly far greater than acceptable.
And another good article on this here:
»www.f-secure.com/2007/2/
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page
| |
|
| | | Re: Good article on WHY getting harder to fight malware And once the security companies come up with something that is (more) effective, the malware criminal organizations will then just attack the company's site. This has happened with antispam sites.
Maybe we'll see security companies teaming up to help each other. Could we see this resulting in mergers?
If the security software gets too complex, most people wouldn't know what to do. So they could possibly click the wrong choice, which could harm their PC. | |
|
|
 wruckman Ruckman.net
join:2007-10-25
Northwood, OH | Free vs pay The problem is that everyone expects perfect protection for free and that just doesn't happen. These people are in business. They need to make money off their products. Free is fine for a little protection. But you don't need any virus protection if you just use a little common computing sense. But unfortunately it isn't as common as common would imply. Most people are just ignorant of their usage habbits. They treat them the same as their sexual habits. No wonder why there are so many STDs for computers these days. Using sheep skin instead of latex it would seem.
--
William Ruckman
»ruckman.net | |
|
|  BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | Re: Free vs pay said by wruckman:The problem is that everyone expects perfect protection for free and that just doesn't happen. No shit. What's with this welfare attitude? People spend hundreds if not over $1000 on a computer and are too cheap to spend $40 or $50 for protection? | |
|
| |  sbrookPremium,Mod
join:2001-12-14
Ottawa
kudos:4
 ·TekSavvy Cable
·Rogers Hi-Speed
| Re: Free vs pay I've used pay and free ones. To be honest, there's so little between them apart from promotion.
The two big guys advertise and promote their products big time. It's costly. They also distribute through stores .. costly, and they maintain a well published web library of threats. These are things you don't get from freebies.
I use one of the lesser "big guys" ... CA and am now on their 3rd incarnation. Originally free, it started charging, then changed to eTrust EZ Antivirus. I liked it because it had a small footprint, but with eTrust, it grew to be significant... not as polluting to my system as Norton or McAfee, but not what it was. Then they added it to a suite and it started on the trip to just being bloatware. Then they changed to CA Security Suite when it headed to real annoying bloatware with imposing overlay windows. The AV itself has a small footprint, but started interfering with email programs. I'll dump it as soon as my current subscription dies.
I don't see a lot of difference between the freebies and the pay ones. Why spend $40 or $50 + annual charges for bloatware and a huge operating footprint when you can get the same kind of protection for free? | |
|
| |
| |  JoeG4
join:2001-12-16
945941 | Re: Free vs pay Windows explorer a virus? Kaspersky sounds really damn accurate to me! 
(I kid, I kid!) | |
|
 Morac
join:2001-08-30
Riverside, NJ
kudos:1
·Comcast
| Sometimes I wonder why we even use AV products I've basically used Norton for the last 10+ years (yes I'm masochistic ) and in that time frame the only virus Norton reported was Second Life (false positive obviously). Other than that there have been no viruses on my machine, mainly because I don't download and run every program and mail attachment out there.
Actually the only program I've experience on my machine that displays virus like tendencies is Norton itself when it slows down my machine or causes other program that access the Internet to hang.
Add to this the new study that says AV programs don't work all that well and I sometimes I wonder why I bother at all since all it takes is one virus to slip through.
I will mention that I don't run any AV program on an old machine of mine, but then I only use it maybe an hour a month (to upgrade Windows). It runs really fast.
--
The Comcast Disney Avatar has been retired. | |
|
|  tcp1Premium
join:2000-04-17
Herndon, VA
 ·Verizon FiOS
| Re: Sometimes I wonder why we even use AV products I agree with you in part, but for other reasons.
The entire virus threat is truly BS, in my opinion.
I've been "online" downloading stuff since 1984.
That's 24 years almost now; my data has not been affected by a single virus, trojan, worm, or other "malware" - AV software or not.
Pretend all you want that there are these vast internet mafias out there and that your data's at constant risk from these multitude of viruses and trojans; it just simply is NOT TRUE.
Yes, they cost companies money - by eating up resources. That's about the only true "virus risk" out there.
Half the time when I hear of peoples' machines being "wiped out by viruses", they clearly aren't.. People love to mistake a hardware failure or their own ineptness for a "virus". | |
|
| | Morac
join:2001-08-30
Riverside, NJ
kudos:1 Reviews:
·Comcast
| Re: Sometimes I wonder why we even use AV products Well I do think some people need AV software. For example the guy who came to me for help because his machine wasn't working after he installed an AV program. The reason it stopped working was because nearly every file on his system was infected with multiple virii. One of the virii changed the Windows registry so that it ran the virii any time an .exe or .com file was executed. The AV program wiped the virus which basically made the computer unusable.
I asked the guy how he managed to get so many virii on his machine and he said he downloads pirated software from bitTorrent and other file sharing networks. This is a person who needed a AV program (though installed it to late).
For the average user, they most likely would never need a AV program. I think of AV programs like buying insurance. Chances are you'll never use it, but it's nice to know it's there. Of course with AV programs, if they don't work then you're not really insured are you.
--
The Comcast Disney Avatar has been retired. | |
|
|
| | | Re: avast Home(FREE) here why do some people say i never had *NO* infections - EVER i seen avast, nod32, Kaspersky and the worst norton and mcafee all miss virus you can not trust any single av out there but some are better than others if you are going to put your full trust in to a av i say that is just stupid if you secure windows you could even get away with no av and if you had windows secured windows right you would not have to perform weekly spyware scans spyware should not even have a chance to install | |
|
| |  dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
kudos:18 | Re: avast Home(FREE) here Re-read my post friend! I stated that I double and triple check my machine regularly.
I don't trust anything! Period!
Spyware is also a non-issue here - I run my various scanners for entertainment - all that is ever found. by any scanner, is cookies!
Cookies are irrelevant!
So yeah, I can say that I have never been infected... YMMV. 
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera | |
|
| | | Reviews:
·DSL EXTREME
1 edit | Re: avast Home(FREE) here said by dadkins:Re-read my post friend! I stated that I double and triple check my machine regularly. I don't trust anything! Period! Spyware is also a non-issue here - I run my various scanners for entertainment - all that is ever found. by any scanner, is cookies! Cookies are irrelevant! So yeah, I can say that I have never been infected... YMMV. I get rid of tracking cookies as they tend drag My cpus performance down, Otherwise I'm like You, I don't get infected, Of course I don't go to porn sites as I'm My income is very low. And Yes I use Avast under XP x64, With AVG one has to pay for that software, Free is better when It works.
--
(25.92GHz crunching for SETI with the PC Perspective Killer Frogs) | |
|
| | | | tcp1Premium
join:2000-04-17
Herndon, VA Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
2 edits | Re: avast Home(FREE) here said by zoom314:I get rid of tracking cookies as they tend drag My cpus performance down, Otherwise I'm like You, I don't get infected, Of course I don't go to porn sites as I'm My income is very low. And Yes I use Avast under XP x64, With AVG one has to pay for that software, Free is better when It works. Not to say tracking cookies are good, but how exactly do they slow your CPU down?
The browser looks up a cookie by the corresponding domain name in an index. This is hopefully an almost instantaneous search (unless MS and Mozilla are idiots), probably in a binary tree, at most converging to almost an O(logN) operation. Often the index itself, which is only a few KB, is in memory for this search. The cookie itself is a small text file with a few name value pairs; if anything, a fraction of a fraction of a percent of your page load and rendering time.
Again, tracking cookies aren't "good" (yet they aren't as insidious as most folks believe) - but unless you're running a pentium 133 or something, they're not "slowing down your CPU."
I guess my problem is all the "urban myths" which pervade this topic.. | |
|
| | | | |  root9
join:2005-04-08
Kitchener, ON | Re: avast Home(FREE) here Whole puter is slowed when anti-virus or security has to check memory, text file of cookie [which can take a long time due to code in the cookie] and any related files referenced with page being accessed
Then we have cookies who reference other cookies to boot
Some pages use up to 60 cookies
Try using opera browser or mozilla with privacy plugins and watch your speeds drop
Using IE is just outright foolish
Some cookies are malformed and may even lock up your browser if they don't get their information from your OS | |
|
| | | | dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
kudos:18 | Thank you Joker! | |
|
| |
| | dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
kudos:18 | Re: avast Home(FREE) here Anytime lil, anytime!
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera | |
|
| tcp1Premium
join:2000-04-17
Herndon, VA Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| Exactly, Dadkins - because it's not as easy to get an infection as so many people like to believe.
If you're relatively recently patched as far as your OS and browser is concerned, and you don't go running completely unknown renegade EXE files and installing ActiveX controls, your chances, believe it or not, are actually pretty damn slim.
Viruses don't come with shareware, freeware, mp3s, or even most porn sites. "Warez" do not generally contain viruses.
Most infections nowadays are of the spam zombie variety, and come from people running a long-unpatched OS. Generally speaking, if those folks aren't updating their OS, they're not running a current AV either, so it really doesn't matter. | |
|
| | dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
kudos:18 | Re: avast Home(FREE) here Thank you tcp1!
Exactly! | |
|
 DotMac4Shill H8rPremium
join:2007-10-26
Huntington Beach, CA
1 edit | No anti-virus software can protect a system from an idiot Even basic precautions on the part of a user can avoid a majority of these problems with AVware picking up the last bit.
The problem isn't AV software getting worse, or malware creators getting better. The problem will always be the idiot in front of the screen who will open every friggin' app that comes from a Sexy Teen Near You or run every keygen they come across.
People are dumb and even HAL9000 can't save them from themselves.
said by UAC :
Open hot sexy picture from polish girl who love anal? Cancel or Allow?
said by Problem :
By all means, ALLOW!
--
"When fascism comes it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." -Ron Paul
»www.ronpaul2008.com/
| |
|
|
See 7 replies to this post |
|
| | Virus I have had one virus since I got my new laptop about 2 years ago now. So I guess I do things right. | |
|
1 edit | I use no AV=No Virus for me I do everything Possible on my computer and don't get anything...I just don't see how people get all of this junk on theres if they only surf the internet and look at buying stuff and go on you tube etc...I just use NOD32 on my parents computer and they have not gotten one virus in 1 1/2 year...I format my hd every month or 2 so I don't have to worry about it | |
|
| root9
join:2005-04-08
Kitchener, ON | Re: I use no AV=No Virus for me If you don't use AV then you don't know if you have any, do you? :P
If you use Microcrap [microsoft] and I tested your system I bet I'd find all kinds of virii and error code. Doesn't matter if you format your box / HD every month or not. MS OS comes with spy code pre-installed. One week [even one day] on net and you are infected. ROLF | |
|
 jgkoltPremium
join:2004-02-21
Lakewood, OH | how about this Go run as a limited user to limit your admin install time, install a mac, scan regularly
--
3 free for you/3 free for me: Free Stock Trades : PM Me | |
|
 Hambone4Hambone
join:2007-08-11
North Hollywood, CA | NOD32 - 68% I luv NOD32. It's effective and it does not load down your confuser like the others do. The major brands will be copying the Eset ingenuity, so expect general improvements in the future.
Merry Christmas everyone! | |
|
|  PolarBear03The bear formerly known as aaron8301Premium
join:2005-01-03 | Re: NOD32 - 68% said by Hambone4: it does not load down your confuser... I like that term! ;D | |
|
| | Best Virus Protection Overall
Upgrade to Linux. | |
|
| tcp1Premium
join:2000-04-17
Herndon, VA | Re: Best Virus Protection Overall Oh for christ's sake, can we have one thread here without someone digging up this tired old joke?
"Install Firefox / Linux / Get A Mac. Problem Solved." is not clever, funny, practical, nor correct. | |
|
| | | | Re: Best Virus Protection Overall said by tcp1:Oh for christ's sake, can we have one thread here without someone digging up this tired old joke? "Install Firefox / Linux / Get A Mac. Problem Solved." is not clever, funny, practical, nor correct. Macs are no longer a secure platform. Popularity == more exploits.
»www.pcworld.com/article/id,14089···cle.html | |
|
| CWO333
join:2005-02-24
Chicago, IL Reviews:
·Comcast
| Once everyone "upgrades" to Linux, all the problems will also upgrade to Linux. I can almost use the term, "Make something idiot-proof and the world will create a bigger idiot." and apply this in the same way. Make an operating system or program that seems a lot more secure and the world will create a lot more or a lot bigger security problems. | |
|
| | Lazlow
join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO
1 edit | Re: Best Virus Protection Overall Last I heard there were only a hand full of viri for Linux in existence and none in the wild. The structure of Linux is such that a virus could only effect the user space of the account that caught the virus(assuming the users was not being a total idiot and running as root). Isolating the viri like this limits the amount of damage that it can do and greatly simplifies its removal.
Oh and for those that say nobody is really using Linux, you should look at the servers that are running out on the net (can you say Google). So the people who write viri are very interested in Linux, just not successful so far. | |
|
| | | root9
join:2005-04-08
Kitchener, ON | Re: Best Virus Protection Overall I have a Unix/Linux system that's been active and on net for over 15 yrs and it hasn't crashed, got infected or been nuked. Even with major attacks against it
Moved it from box to box, upgraded it to present standards, tried to kill it and it still keeps running great.
Look and learn:
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virus_statistics
go figure, ROFL | |
|
 NOYBSt. John 3.16Premium
join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR
kudos:1 | A Couple Points1) All you who insist you have never had a virus or just one, two, etc. do not really know this to be fact. All you really know is how many viruses have been detected. You could be infected right now and not know. Furthermore you all know the cliche, "you get what you pay for". Depending freeware anti-virus products and claiming no infections is not very credible.
2) What would go a long ways to improve security / protection would be for Comcast and the other cable broadband ISPs to provide a router/NAT like most DSL and Fiber based services do, instead of the default being to connect customers computers directly. Sure, if you are here reading this you do not need that hand holding, but you are a very small minority. The vast majoring of cable HIS subscribers are connected directly with either no 'firewall' or at best the Windows default software firewall and they have not even an inkling of a clue. I commend Verizon Online FiOS for providing a router/NAT with 'good' default configuration.
Been running McAfee VirusScan Enterprise Workstation for years in both large corporate environment and personal use. Can not recall the last time a virus was detected. Usually happens though when someone in the corporate environment gets infected and starts spreading it around.
--
Be a Good Netizen - Read, Know & Honor Your ISP Terms of Service
Comcast: »www.comcast.net/terms/index.jsp
Verizon: »onlinehelp.verizon.net/consumer/···0707.pdf | |
|
| tcp1Premium
join:2000-04-17
Herndon, VA Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
1 edit | Re: A Couple Points said by NOYB:1) All you who insist you have never had a virus or just one, two, etc. do not really know this to be fact. All you really know is how many viruses have been detected. You could be infected right now and not know. Furthermore you all know the cliche, "you get what you pay for". Depending freeware anti-virus products and claiming no infections is not very credible. Not very sanguine, but not really true.
I guess first off, if said virus is not affecting my data, performance, or privacy, how much does it matter then?
Regardless, what you're saying is a bit of paranoia. Viruses can only be introduced into a system through certain vectors; they can only operate in specific ways. You can talk all you want about the "ubervirus" that's undetectable by anything that we may all have - fine - but is that a really arguable point then in this debate?
All we can know is what is actually seen in the wild; and the truth of it is that viruses just aren't causing that much havoc out there in the daily lives of computer users. Be as paranoid as you want that something may be lurking, but you need to be empirical when talking about what really matters.
I have not lost one bit of data to anything that I could not definitely trace to a hardware or non-malicious software failure in 23 years. If any of these statistics were correct, I should have had at least a couple of "mysterious catastrophes", don't you think? | |
|
| | root9
join:2005-04-08
Kitchener, ON | Re: A Couple Points With all due respect: then you really need to come to my shop and see what I see on daily basis
Right now I'm working on a box that keeps crashing after install of MS OS. This thing has been scanned with every popular AV, anti-spyware and anti-malware. Now checking HD for code in formatting, MBR, firmware etc.
To date I've found over 180 pieces of virii, nuke and kill code on HD. I've backtracked it all to crappy IE. User had AVG Pro then switched to NOD32 and still got infected.
BTW: Rest of hardware is A1 | |
|
| sbrookPremium,Mod
join:2001-12-14
Ottawa
kudos:4 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
·Rogers Hi-Speed
| said by NOYB:1) All you who insist you have never had a virus or just one, two, etc. do not really know this to be fact. and then you go and use the same argument ...
Been running McAfee VirusScan Enterprise Workstation for years in both large corporate environment and personal use. Can not recall the last time a virus was detected.
But I reiterate my argument from another post ... paid for is not necessarily better than free. The big guys "enterprise" editions do seem to be better and different products from their standard versions and most report far fewer problems with them. | |
|
| | NOYBSt. John 3.16Premium
join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR
kudos:1 | Re: A Couple Points
No I did not use the same argument. I said, "can not recall the last time a virus was detected." That is very different than saying have never had a virus.
| |
|
 bencPremium
join:2007-06-17
Glen Carbon, IL
·Charter
| It Could Just Be Another Scare Or it could be people not following common sense tactics (downloading from strange sites, etc.).
I think I've have a virus before, but it's been a long time. I haven't even had a BSOD since probably '99 or so (no joke!).
Back in the late 90's, I didn't even have an AV program. Shocking, isn't it? Of course, in those days I was still using dial-up regularly (a practice I finally gave up in 2003). I also made damn sure not to download any dialers that were going to dial 900 numbers that cost $1/min. (or more).
For awhile, I used Mcafee, though I then figured that it seemed to slow my PC down big time. I switched to Norton when I got Vista Biz 64-bit (a decision I now partially regret, I should have gotten XP Pro 64-bit instead), though Norton seems faster.
When I use Norton, the only things that ever turn up is a tracking cookie that I always delete, but never a virus. My PC also never seems to act erratically, though since it's Vista on a single-core Opteron it seems slow at times, despite disabling Superfetch (it eats all my RAM).
I'd consider alternatives, but I still have a ways to go before my subscription expires.
I also use a Linux router that blocks everything except what I want to get through.
My experience may sound wonderful, although admittedly I'm not the average user at all. I know my stuff, which is how I've avoided BSOD (though I don't over-clock, either).
Well, I don't claim to be an expert, but I certainly know enough that I'm my own tech support and I only call tech support for say, an ISP if it's a problem at their end. | |
|
jsouthJsouth
join:2000-12-12
Wichita, KS | I don't believe I don't believe that the protections are getting worse. I think it's more of a user problem. People may have an anti-virus program but some don't update them or they get an alert, but they go ahead and ignore it and open the file anyway.
--
Bush bashing is old. How about more solutions instead? | |
|
 maartenaElmoPremium
join:2002-05-10
Orange, CA
kudos:1
·AT&T U-Verse
 ·DIRECTV
| The last three The last three times my antivirus program gave an alert and stopped a virus or trojan..... was when I downloaded a CRACK to some program I liked and didn't want to pay for. My guess is that many people that get infected get them through crack sites, you gotta be real carefull where you click there, and without an updated anti virus program, people with not much experience but have heard something about "serialz" and "crackz" will be easy, easy targets.
The problem of many people? Their free subscription for a year they got with their PC has ran out, and they don't want to pay for renewal. They don't know how to uninstall the software properly and re-install a free antivirus program.
Viruses get released every day. Updates for antivirus at least once a week, often multple times a week. But if you stop getting your updates because your subscription ran out and you are too cheap to pay for it OR you don't replace it with a good free antivirus, you will be asking for trouble sooner or later.
--
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both" -
Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father. | |
|
| Reviews:
·Speakeasy
| Re: The last three A good point - Most consumer PCs I run across have expired pre-installed AV on them. Ran across just that today, doing a favor cleaning up malware on a laptop for a friend who let guests browse on it.
My guess is that they were the "1,000,000th visitor" or "Won a free ipod/iphone" etc.
Once I uninstalled Norton and all its bloat accessories, the boot memory footprint of the machine dropped by over half. Loaded up AVG. After detecting another trojan that Clamwin had missed, they now have a much faster machine.
There are so many terms for it.. PBKAC, ID-10-T.. Seat Box failure is my favorite... | |
|
| | anti-virus Just by a mac | |
|
| | Who really needs AV software??? It's shown to not work... I have to agree most probs come from the false sense of safety people have simply because they installed some "Security Suite" and they pay a fee to use it every year or since the addition of a "firewall" to XP.
My experience has shown one HUGE hole in a system's security is simple...and that is HTML format email. All email programs should by default be configured to show email in text only formatting and not show images by default. Users need to be forced to learn to understand how email works and how to spot questionable emails. Plus I imagine simple text based email is easier for many people to understand. There are still zillions of folks who have never used a wordprocessor and are overwhelmed by software that is too feature rich.
Secondly people need to use a proper HOSTS file and keep it updated. I get updates from a couple sources out there that I can trust. This is one ability that needs to be built into Windows and has not received the attention it really should as this is a place to add significant protection to both system integrity and privacy. I suspect because one can block ad-sites here MS is not too excited to promoted the ability. Would the internet collapse if everyone started blocking all tracking/ad services out there? Would MS remove the ability? OK, that is a whole different topic...back on point...
Then lock down their router & pc's firewall (not that joke called Windows Firewall).
Though most email services are now much better about prescanning email, until folks ween off HTML email most virus infections will still and continue to originate here. When we all used to write letters just how often did you need to write in 40pt red Helvetica or whatever? Plain text is fine for 99% of emails a person will ever send or receive.
Overall the AV situation simply proves the adage that "...stoopid peepholes should never be allowed to breed..." or run with jello cubes or be allowed to create OS's with over one-BILLION lines of code.
The article points out a problem that has been developing over the past 10-years. Big corporations have swallowed up the good small software companies or developers. This leads to little innovation and slow reaction to rapidly evolving tactics. All in the name of the all mighty quarterly report. The heck with actually protecting systems. And never ever actually edu-ma-cate your customers as they will stop being customers if they actually learn enough to see you no longer provide any value for the cash.
I personally I have not used any AV software in about 7-years now. I got very tired of the idea of spending a lot of cash every year to "protect" my systems from virus probs. If I was running an -ix variant OS there would have never been an issue. But I am lazy and well try getting drivers for come OS options so I started reading more and figured out how to use the pretty decent security built into XP. Plus I wanted to see if I could get by OK w/o AV software. I do cringe whenever the girlfriend uses one of my systems as she is not exactly as paranoid as I would like...but give me time, a few more years and I'll get her to that point...
I view all email in text only format, use a locked down HOSTS file, solid router, enable every sort of SPAM filtering I can on my email server, run spyware/ad-ware scans on a regular basis, and I try and be smart about what sites I visit as well as the software I download. And I d/l lots of software to try out.
One thing I do still do is run with full admin rights for my account. It gets old having to change ID's for system stuff. I know I shouldn't but, eh, I am a lazy guy.
Last they need to keep their OS's updated. That goes for all OS's...they all have holes. In some cases the biggest hole might be the person running the company but still one needs to keep everything up to date...enable auto-updating.
I even use an off-the-shelf router that while it can be cracked if someone really tries is pretty solid and well setup out of the box. I would like to upgrade to a business/industrial grade router someday but that kilo-buck price point is a tad more then I care to spend.
Lately I have been fiddling with all my web browsing being done from within a VPC session...it's interesting to me just how effective VPC's will be for combating virus issues, especially Zombie system infections. Until the virus/hijack writers develop methods to break out of the VPC session.
Some days I am tempted to go back to using QNX and be done with it all...loved that OS at one time. Or run Windows inside a VPC running Solaris or some flavor of Linux/Unix...it could happen as we get stuff like dual quad-core systems.
sorry for the long post...oops!! | |
|
| | | Re: Who really needs AV software??? It's shown to not work... So then you agree the best security you can have is Common Sense. | |
|
| | | | Re: Who really needs AV software??? It's shown to not work... absolutely...common sense...strange concept, huh?
People forget that once upon a time it was common sense that was considered a survival trait...now when one exhibits common sense it's frowned upon as disruptive by the AmeriCorps and EuroCorps. I mean aren't we all supposed to pony up $100's monthly just to be able to turn on our equipment? (no Viagra does not count!!) But $50/year here, $35/yr there, $20/yr over there and $5/month for this, $2/episode for that...it is money dumped right into that "pay someone else to tell me what I want and need..." bit bucket. | |
|
| | antivirus I dont use antivirus software I run linux | |
|
Hambone4Hambone
join:2007-08-11
North Hollywood, CA | A/V I get my flu shot each year and I never get the flu! | |
|
| | | Re: A/V said by Hambone4:I get my flu shot each year and I never get the flu! Do you really? Most people I talk to who get an anti-flu shot usually end up getting sick shortly thereafter. Just like anti-virus software, the anti-flu shots are becoming less effective. | |
|
| | Hambone4Hambone
join:2007-08-11
North Hollywood, CA | Re: A/V On a serious note... the last flu shot I received was when I was with SAC in the USAF. Whatever it was that they were blowing into our arms... the flu immunizations would make me sick. I don't believe they are any better, today.
MERRY CHRISTMAS...everyone | |
|
|
|
·
