"or to keep illegal file-sharing records that assist corporate interests."

said by manfmmd :

I was turning blue...

Has DSLR finally acknowledged that the sharing of copyrighted works is ILLEGAL?

Seems so.

Colleges should be held accountable if they are not keeping copyrighted content from being distributed via their network.

said by boober321 :

Way to go Dems, it only took a year for you to go from cleaning up Washington, to pandering and outright corruption.

said by boober321 :

Way to go Dems, it only took a year for you to go from cleaning up Washington, to pandering and outright corruption.

said by hopeflicker :

So,you as a tax payer, would not mind if your taxes are wasted on this?

said by espaeth :

How are tax dollars wasted on this? Our tax dollars also go to pay for law enforcement and the judicial branch of government. This is just another extension of that funding.

We, as a society, have deemed that theft is unacceptable. It's only fitting that we should follow that up with action.

said by n2jtx :

In terms of this bill, the Republicans support it because it helps their big business interests and involves their favorite pass-time, surveillance. For the Democrats, it supports their Hollywood buddies.

SEC. 494. CAMPUS-BASED DIGITAL THEFT PREVENTION.

`(a) In General- Each eligible institution participating in any program under this title shall to the extent practicable--

`(1) make publicly available to their students and employees, the policies and procedures related to the illegal downloading and distribution of copyrighted materials required to be disclosed under section 485(a)(1)(P); and

`(2) develop a plan for offering alternatives to illegal downloading or peer-to-peer distribution of intellectual property as well as a plan to explore technology-based deterrents to prevent such illegal activity.

`(b) Grants-

`(1) PROGRAM AUTHORITY- The Secretary may make grants to institutions of higher education, or consortia of such institutions, and enter into contracts with such institutions, consortia, and other organizations, to develop, implement, operate, improve, and disseminate programs of prevention, education, and cost-effective technological solutions, to reduce and eliminate the illegal downloading and distribution of intellectual property. Such grants or contracts may also be used for the support of a higher education centers that will provide training, technical assistance, evaluation, dissemination, and associated services and assistance to the higher education community as determined by the Secretary and institutions of higher education.

`(2) AWARDS- Grants and contracts shall be awarded under paragraph (1) on a competitive basis.

`(3) APPLICATIONS- An institution of higher education or a consortium of such institutions that desires to receive a grant or contract under paragraph (1) shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and containing or accompanied by such information as the Secretary may reasonably require by regulation.

`(4) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS- There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2009 and for each of the 4 succeeding fiscal years.'.

said by espaeth :

We, as a society, have deemed that theft is unacceptable. It's only fitting that we should follow that up with action.

said by lordofwhee :

You're right, we've determined that theft is wrong. Piracy is NOT theft. Nobody loses ANY money because you downloaded the latest Britney Spears release. All they lose is a potential customer, and so their profits go down.

You can't lose something you never had.

said by TKJunkMail :

P.S.> Sometimes I despair of the level of ignorance of our legislative system by the typical US voter. I sometimes think voters should have to take a test before they are allowed to vote. Maybe then we would have better legislators.