  ieolus Support The Clecs
join:2001-06-19 Duluth, GA | Something seems off...
Only $5 million merger?  |
|
  spm9999 Fluffy Farkletush Premium join:2003-11-17 Imperial, MO clubs:
·ViaTalk
·Dish Network
·Charter Pipeline
·1and1
| off topic sort of but
I have to do it..
The article says 5 million dollar deal.. I read it was billion..
Only reason I say that is it reminds me of Mike Meyers doing doctor evil..
eh.. guess you had to be there. -- »www.menofart.com |
|
  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
2 edits | The FCC staff approved this merger
Here are some more details on the merger:
»www.alleyinsider.com/2008/6/fcc_···_screwed
The FCC's staff has given the XM and Sirius merger the go-ahead, which means it's finally a done deal (after a mere 15 months or so) unless something extraordinary happens in the near future, the WSJ reports.
Technically, the FCC itself has to vote on the merger, and XM (XMSR) and Sirius (SIRI) will have to agree to a couple of concessions (price caps, a pledge to let other companies make receivers, a promise to hand over 8% of the spectrum to third-party broadcasters, etc).
But there's no reason to think the commission itself won't approve the deal, likely within the next three weeks. And the desperate satellite guys would agree to just about anything to get this deal done. Unfortunately, we still don't see a merger helping the two companies out long-term: Consumer apathy plus increased competition are much harder to overcome than federal regulators. To read the WSJ article, go here and click on the link: »news.google.com/news?as_q=FCC+St···wall+str
The WSJ hints that Martin may NOT have the votes to get this passed, thereby triggering MORE concessions by XM & Sirius. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
 ke4pym
join:2004-07-24 Charlotte, NC | I have a bad feeling about this
I chose XM for a reason (music choice, not subsidizing Howard Stern, etc). I hope Sirius doesn't screw XM over too badly.
I'd really rather they have not allowed this to go through. |
|
 Mr Matt
join:2008-01-29 Eustis, FL
·Comcast
·Embarq
| How big will the kick back be to the GOP.
I wonder how many $$$ Sirius/XM will kick back to the "Greedy Old Pigs" (GOP), through campaign contributions, for using the Kevin Martin rubber stamp to approve the merger? I guess the K-Street Boys will be throwing a party, celebrating another win or Corporate America! BTW they forgot to require Sirius/XM to replace all customers receivers compatible with the combined system. I paid about $499.00 for my factory installed XM Receiver. I do not want to have to glue a new receiver to my dashboard to continue the receive my XSiriusM programming. |
|
  pnh102 Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty Premium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast
| Lame Conditions
quote: There will supposedly be some concessions applied to the $5 billion merger, including the carrier being forced to turn over 24 channels to noncommercial and minority programming ...
Why are these conditions in place? Satellite radio is a luxury service. It should not be subjected to the same inane content regulations that made terrestrial radio the garbage that it is today. -- This isn't fair! I was only supposed to hate just ONE presidential candidate! |
|
  james
join:2001-02-26 antarctica
| reply to Mr Matt Re: How big will the kick back be to the GOP.
said by Mr Matt :  I wonder how many $$$ Sirius/XM will kick back to the "Greedy Old Pigs" (GOP), through campaign contributions, for using the Kevin Martin rubber stamp to approve the merger? Nowhere near as much money as the NAB has used to bribe (oh I'm sorry, "lobby") congressmen and others in order to stop the merger.
Either the companies merge or they both go under. |
|
  scots Can we have Twinkies? Premium join:1999-12-06 Raleigh, NC
·AT&T U-Verse
·ooma
·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T CallVantage
2 edits | reply to Mr Matt The two companies said a long time ago that nobody would need new equipment for the combined companies. Channels that are duplicates from each service will have one of them dropped (like no need for two top 40 channels, two 80's channels, etc). The only things they'll be keeping from both are exclusive channels like Howard Stern, Oprah, Martha Stewart, etc. All they have to do is send the same content through each other's satellites, and everyone's got everything. There's no reason to make anyone get new equipment. |
|
 ke4pym
join:2004-07-24 Charlotte, NC
·VOIPo
·Verizon BroadbandA..
·Packet8
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to james said by james :Either the companies merge or they both go under. Where do you get that from? According to this:
»www.charlotte.com/463/story/671846.html
"Both companies have lost money each year since they launched their satellites, but have not said the merger was necessary to keep them afloat." |
|
  furlonium Computer Over? Virus equals Very Yes?
join:2002-05-08 Bethlehem, PA
| reply to pnh102 Re: Lame Conditions
said by pnh102 : quote: There will supposedly be some concessions applied to the $5 billion merger, including the carrier being forced to turn over 24 channels to noncommercial and minority programming ...
Why are these conditions in place? Satellite radio is a luxury service. It should not be subjected to the same inane content regulations that made terrestrial radio the garbage that it is today. Agreed. -- »www.myspace.com/intranet
I once had a dream that Sean Connery stayed at my apt., and he had his laptop with Win98 on it, and he knew how to connect to my wireless network. I don't do drugs  |
|
  james
join:2001-02-26 antarctica
| reply to ke4pym Re: How big will the kick back be to the GOP.
That quote is exactly where I got that from. Both companies are bleeding money, it doesnt take a genius to figure out that if your company loses money each year it is in existence that's a bad thing. Investment capital isn't some unlimited money fountain.
The reason they will never admit they're going to be bankrupt without the merger is because if it doesnt go through, their stock will immediately drop like a rock while everyone scrambles to get out. No company is stupid enough to admit that it's doomed unless it wants to lose its investors. |
|
  Chiyo Save Me Konata-Chan Premium join:2003-02-20 Minneapolis, MN clubs:
·Comcast
| reply to furlonium Re: Lame Conditions
said by furlonium :said by pnh102 : quote: There will supposedly be some concessions applied to the $5 billion merger, including the carrier being forced to turn over 24 channels to noncommercial and minority programming ...
Why are these conditions in place? Satellite radio is a luxury service. It should not be subjected to the same inane content regulations that made terrestrial radio the garbage that it is today. Agreed. Amen screw minority programming people won't listen to it anyway. |
|
 DoRight
join:2007-07-20 Mechanicsburg, PA
·Comcast
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Verizon FIOS
| Hope Sirius doesn't change.. :)
I just hope that Sirius doesn't go down the drain. They have taken such good care of me as a customer.
Examples: I gave my radio to a friend and didn't get it back so they gave me a new one at no charge and transferred my service. I lost my job and could not afford to pay for a few months so they gave me a few months free until I could pay. Now that is a company that wants to keep their customers happy. Go Sirius!!! |
|
 Austinloop
join:2001-08-19 Austin, TX | reply to Chiyo Re: Lame Conditions
And let us not forget the "public access" channels that the local authorities force onto the cable systems. I just love trying to find something to listen to on the car radio on Sunday morning. It is either church or public service shows. |
|
  kfsutops Premium join:2002-08-19 Brandon, FL clubs: 
| Welcome to the new
Welcome to the new cable industry business model. People can say what they want. This is gong to be bad for the customer. Maybe not for the next three years. But it is bad for the customer.
I know..I know...people are going to say that "satellite is not a necessary service, why would they raise prices," or "raising prices will make them lose customers."
Remember, cable isn't a necessary service either according according to people on here. And I think you know what goes on there. -- "There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots" |
|
  P Ness You'Ve Forgotten 9-11 Already Premium join:2001-08-29 Mineola, NY clubs: 
| minorities use the Crutch Again
to get free stations/bandwith.....
wonderful.
funny did exxon-mobile give 10% of their stations to minorities for free. Bet it did not happen...lol -- www.stopfcc.comI do not think the government needs to restrict free speech especially on a device that has an off knob. |
|
 EPS
join:2008-02-13 Hingham, MA | reply to james Re: How big will the kick back be to the GOP.
That's true- the only companies allowed to lose money year after year for extended periods of time are the major airlines, and even they have to go bankrupt now and then. |
|
  pennstatejim
join:2007-10-10 Reading, PA
·Verizon Online DSL
·Comcast
| reply to ke4pym Re: I have a bad feeling about this
They made it perfectly clear that if you choose not to change your service, then your service will not change. I listened to XM and Sirius, and chose Sirius for the music selection and the NFL and NASCAR coverage.
If they were to cut out the music channels I like because they feel XM's are better, then I will not be a happy camper.
With the fact that they have 17 million receivers out there that can only pick up one or the other, I wouldn't expect channel consolidation to take place for a few years. |
|
 flyingjoey
join:2005-11-07 Jersey City, NJ | Does this mean???
Does this mean, I'm getting my Nascar, NBA, MLB and my Howard Stern for the same price... Yooohoooo!
I was a long time XM customer, but I moved over to Sirius after Stern left K-rock. |
|
  pnh102 Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty Premium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast
| reply to Chiyo Re: Lame Conditions
said by Chiyo :Amen screw minority programming people won't listen to it anyway. You might want to take a listen to Sirius. As a subscriber, I can tell it literally has something for everyone. The government should have no business telling a private subscription-based service what content it should not carry. -- This isn't fair! I was only supposed to hate just ONE presidential candidate! |
|