republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » MPAA: Evidence? Who Needs Evidence?
Search Topic:
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2008-06-23 09:30:49: I've recently highlighted several reports showing that the RIAA's method of identifying and suing P2P users is painfully inaccurate. ..

page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5
AuthorAll Replies


Chiyo
Save Me Konata-Chan
Premium
join:2003-02-20
Minneapolis, MN
clubs:
·Comcast

bah who needs a fair trial

hey who needs a fair trial I mean we always assume guilty before innocent why waste the people's and court's time
--
My Blog:
»abanzai.animeblogger.net/


AnonProxy
Proxy of Anon
Premium
join:2001-05-12
ß
Yeah fair trial, evidence, due process....

all mere technicalities. You should pay what we say you should pay.

F' the RIAA and the MPAA and their oddly Nazi like tactics.

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX
You maybe unfairly demeaning Nazis. This is RIAA and the MPAA we are talking about.

Anomaly95

join:2005-12-11
Phoenix, AZ
desperate much?

Wow. This just reeks of desperation for holding on to their current business model.


milnoc

join:2001-03-05
H3B
Conviction without proof?

Doesn't that go against the principles of Justice?

By any chance does this lawyer work at Guantanamo?


Chiyo
Save Me Konata-Chan
Premium
join:2003-02-20
Minneapolis, MN
clubs:
I say we boycott the MPAA and their movies I personally haven't been to a movie in over 2 years and I don't ever download them.


Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

said by Chiyo See Profile :

I say we boycott the MPAA and their movies I personally haven't been to a movie in over 2 years and I don't ever download them.
You've missed some really good movies. Ouch.


dadkins
Can you do Blu?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
·Comcast

WTF are they smoking?

I say they have been ripping us all off and should pay all of us $250,000.00 - no evidence needed!

See what they say to that...
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera


gatorkram
Spelling and Grammer impared
Premium
join:2002-07-22
Winterville, NC
clubs:
·Embarq
·linode

Tuff Call...

As much as I hate the RIAA/MPAA types, they sort of have a point in this case..

If I have bootleg cds or movies on sale, does someone have to buy them for it to be a crime to make them available for sale?

In much the same way, if you make files available to be taken and used, I think the crime is committed.

I don't really agree the crime should be on the person making the files available, it should be the people who take them who commit the crime.

What if I make copies of my own cds and dvds available in a shared folder on my pc, so that I can use them how and where I wish. One could argue they forgot they should have a password. Maybe this is the whole issue they are trying to avoid.
--
Give me bandwidth or give me death!
»/testhistory/661871/4f240

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
reply to Chiyo
Re: bah who needs a fair trial

besides, laws are for the little people, not big corporations (eg, see Telecom Amnesty)


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME

reply to dadkins
Re: WTF are they smoking?

Right... the quality of movies (written / acted) has gone decreased exponentially with the advent of CGI based movies, where the special effects replace any decent acting/script with eye candy visuals.
--
Canada = Hollywood North


Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
The MPAA is infringing on 1,000,000 of my works.

I'm entitled to a zillion dollars?

Proof? I don't need proof.


major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
clubs:

reply to gatorkram
Re: Tuff Call...

said by gatorkram See Profile :

In much the same way, if you make files available to be taken and used, I think the crime is committed.

I don't really agree the crime should be on the person making the files available, it should be the people who take them who commit the crime.

Go work for the diaRIAA then.
--
The Toll

Tracking Lord Stanley


Camelot One
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-21
Sarasota, FL
clubs:

reply to gatorkram
The courts have already ruled that just making the files available isn't enough. I see your argument, but that part isn't up for debate at this point. And it was the other courts ruling this way that prompted the judge to (possibly) grant a new trial.
--
Intel Q6600 @3400Mhz/GA-EP35-DS3P/2x 2048Mb G.Skill/Seagate 750.10/EVGA 8800GT's SLI/Silverstone 850W/Custom water cooler


Nightfall
My Goal Is To Deny Yours
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-03
Grand Rapids, MI
·Comcast
·AT&T Midwest
·Site5.com

reply to Chiyo
Re: Conviction without proof?

said by Chiyo See Profile :

I say we boycott the MPAA and their movies I personally haven't been to a movie in over 2 years and I don't ever download them.
The unfortunate part is that people can't boycott correctly. A lot of people think that they can download and watch/listen freely. What you are doing is boycotting the right way. Don't download, don't watch, and don't participate in anything related to the MPAA. Then, they have no one to blame but themselves when they see their profits falling.


Nightfall
My Goal Is To Deny Yours
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-03
Grand Rapids, MI
·Comcast
·AT&T Midwest
·Site5.com

reply to gatorkram
Re: Tuff Call...

said by gatorkram See Profile :

As much as I hate the RIAA/MPAA types, they sort of have a point in this case..

If I have bootleg cds or movies on sale, does someone have to buy them for it to be a crime to make them available for sale?

In much the same way, if you make files available to be taken and used, I think the crime is committed.

I don't really agree the crime should be on the person making the files available, it should be the people who take them who commit the crime.

What if I make copies of my own cds and dvds available in a shared folder on my pc, so that I can use them how and where I wish. One could argue they forgot they should have a password. Maybe this is the whole issue they are trying to avoid.
Its not that hard to go to the next step which is downloading the material and verifying it is copyrighted material. You can keep track of everyone who is sharing it very easily with any P2P application. Just take the time to grab it and verify then. Then you have a leg to stand on.

Don't get me wrong, I want to see anyone who infringes on copyright to get prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. However, the RIAA and MPAA doing all this fasttracking of lawsuits is just a bunch of crap. If they were doing this the right way the whole time, people wouldn't be able to complain.

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX

reply to gatorkram
I realize that the burden of proof to prove someone "guilty" is much lower in a civil proceeding. However, there still must be some proof, not just you got it in a shared folder doesn't make you "guilty" of anything.

You are "guilty" of something if you knowingly download a known copyrighted work from the internet.

If I leave my door unlocked, does that mean that I committed a crime because someone may have access to my possessions, I don't think so.


TScheisskopf
World News Trust

join:2005-02-13
Belvidere, NJ
·Sprint Broadband D..

reply to Anomaly95
Re: desperate much?

And when you look at record sales, and the top-heavy structure of all the major labels, then look at the quality of music they release(Oh sure, good acts come along, but that's generally a bolt out of the blue and they are as surprised as you are when it happens), you begin to see that suing world+dog is pretty much the only viable business model they have left.

Trust me: If an act breaks big and sticks around past it's time of option, it is in spite of the system, not because of it. This is one of the reasons a lot of successful acts negotiate their own record labels. Just to put some distance between them and the incompetence and feral creatures at the majors.

It's a bitter pill for a veteran artist to be told what to do on the next album by some wunderkind fresh out of college radio. Especially when it is well-known that said wunderkind signed Joe Booger and His Rockin' Snotballs because they used to play his frat parties.

The last thing to remember is that signed acts become pawns in power-plays within record companies. Those that win in those power plays, well, their acts win as well. Those that lose, their acts are usually jettisoned. A lot of promising artists go away that way.

Put it all together and you really have to wonder is they really have a business model. If they do, it's gotta be "Sell records. Or something, like maybe go to lunch."


wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY
·Verizon FIOS
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·RoadRunner Cable
·BroadVoice

reply to en102
Re: WTF are they smoking?

said by en102 See Profile :

Right... the quality of movies (written / acted) has gone decreased exponentially with the advent of CGI based movies, where the special effects replace any decent acting/script with eye candy visuals.
So very true. I dont even consider GCI to be "eye candy" simply because it looks so fake. Part of what made older movies good was there was an actual human (a stunt double, but still a person) doing most things we saw on the screen. These days, "actors" do a 5 minute cut scene for the very beginning of the movie and then the next 2 hours is CGI garbage.
--
If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.
-Ronald Reagan-
Forums » MPAA: Evidence? Who Needs Evidence?page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5


Thursday, 10-Dec 04:01:12 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF