Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Unlimited, Illegal P2P Use For A Monthly Fee?
Search Topic:
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2008-08-14 08:54:25: Some of you might remember the noise several years ago surrounding Playlouder, a service that allowed UK ISP subscribers to trade copyrighted music freely within the network via any p2p client they choose, with Playlouder paying copyright holders. ..

AuthorAll Replies


baineschile
2600
Premium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI
Yeah

I sure would want to register my name and credit card number in order to trade illegal software and media.

its bad enough with ISP tracking already.

The solution? Dont pirate material, and dont use pirated material


nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy

said by baineschile See Profile :

I sure would want to register my name and credit card number in order to trade illegal software and media.

its bad enough with ISP tracking already.

The solution? Dont pirate material, and dont use pirated material
Though, if you had a "service" backed by the rights-holders, it would no longer be pirated material at that point (since the rights holders would be being compensated for their property's distribution).
--
The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. -- Bertrand Russell


battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000
You could think of it as an insurance policy against being sued for trading music via p2p.


big jake



can't stop it!

pirated material will always be here. you can't stop it from being. i don't know if some people just like the thrill or what. people will always download material that has been copyrighted. they are like water or life; they will always find a way. every step that is taken to stop pirating the pirates are there to step with it.

axus

join:2001-06-18
Washington, DC
probably get sued

People will think they can download movies and software, then the copyright holders will start asking for money (or sue).


Dryv1yne

@prkcorp.com

Oh no...

this will just give ISPs another "fake" revenue stream if this idea takes off. Just like how they try to spin caps as a positive thing they would try adding an obligatory fee to everyone's monthly bill to cover pirating and try to pass it off as another positive thing they're doing for the consumer


dadkins
Can you do Blu?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
·Comcast

Deep Inspection and Tracked?

Uhm, tell me again how this inspection and tracking would only be used for music...

Yeah, this is s step in the wrong direction.
Who gets all this data?
What guarrantee is there that the data doesn't get sold?
Looking somewhat like a paid-for route into a NebuAD-esk nightmare.

I see many snafus in this things future!
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera


swhx7
Premium
join:2006-07-23
Elbonia
·RoadRunner Cable

Right, and I'll list some of the additional problems.

* This kind of arrangement would have to be a whole separate ISP, or otherwise have some way to separate out the users who want to file-share and have their traffic monitored and pay for it, from the rest who aren't interested in getting the files and don't want to pay for them.

* How are they going to detect all the file transfers that copyright holders expect to get paid for? Even changing one bit will change the hash of a file. There are some inspection methods that try to look at the whole structure of a music or video file (after re-assembling the pieces), but this is unreliable. Besides, even weak encryption will prevent identifying the files.

* Because of the file-identification problem, what they're probably talking about is sharing of only the particular files that users get from this one service, with these files containing special markers and have their hashes in a list so they can be spotted easily. So then you have a limited selection to choose from, and copyright holders would not get paid for transfers of files not on the list.

* Does any of the money ever go to the artists/creators at all? Typically with things like this, it's only a fraction of a cent per dollar, with the rest going to the corporate copyright holders that exploit the artists.


baineschile
2600
Premium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI
reply to battleop
Re: Yeah

the problem is...what software distributor (aka adobe) or studio (mgm) would lease out rights for their material to be traded? they would if they got $$$$$$ from it; but a small monthly fee wouldnt cover the gree from the copyrighters


battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000
I doubt it would cover anything and everything you could share via p2p. I am sure it would be limited to music, tv shows, and other similar content.

netnerd

join:2007-04-14
Oakland, CA
if u pay a fee to pirate, that' call buying it!

i dont get it!
if u paying a monthly fee to pirate. is it really pirate?
i guess i'm pirating itune too, i pay a fee 99cent each song to pirate!
i pirating Microsoft Vista too! i paid a fee of 199$ to priate!


Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Time Warner Cable
·Time Warner VOIP


2 edits
reply to battleop
Re: Yeah

said by battleop See Profile :

You could think of it as an insurance policy against being sued for trading music via p2p.
they all ready charge a fee on dvd-r's and cd-r's

why pay the fee two times


cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN

"Deep Packet Inspection"

quote:
...the “deep packet inspection” technology, installed on the broadband infrastructure, recognises every song downloaded over the ISP network, no matter which protocol...
I'd like to see the algorithm that can properly figure out not only if a song is copyrighted, but also who the copyright belongs to. Take the popular song Yesterday, original performed by the Beetles. It's been covered more then 3,000 times. If it can identify which of the 3,000+ copyright holders a particular version belongs to, regardless of encoding, bitrate, sampling frequency, protocol AND encryption method, that's amazing. I'm sure there are some TLA that would love that type of technology.

backness

join:2005-07-08
K2P OW2
not to mention all the different encodings of mp3's ogg's, waves, flacs and what ever other codec has been used to encode it


Doctor Four
My other vehicle is a TARDIS
Premium
join:2000-09-05
Dallas, TX
·AT&T U-Verse

reply to cdru
And that is why using Audible Magic's system of identifying
copyrighted files is going to fail utterly.

When NSA-grade encryption is used to hide what files are
being traded, anything that the current anti-piracy snake
oil peddlers try to sell to Organized Music will be useless.
--
"The trouble with computers, of course, is that they are very sophisticated idiots." - Doctor Who (from Robot)
Forums » Unlimited, Illegal P2P Use For A Monthly Fee?


Sunday, 06-Dec 03:02:26 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF