baineschile
2600
Premium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI
 ·Comcast
 ·magicjack.com
 ·Verizon Wireless B..
| Why bother....
When California falls into the ocean.
Actually, this is a good idea. Nice for the city to take control of their broadband future; it adds to the competition for other providers in the area, and will lower prices, and increase services (hopefully) |
|
hottboiinnc
ME
join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH | I doubt anyone will lower their prices. The ISPs there know how far the service reaches and how good it was and will be. |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY | whos paying
So whos paying for the T3 powering this thing? |
|
johnny_t
Premium
join:2004-03-21
Palo Alto, CA
 ·AT&T Yahoo
| said by patcat88  :So whos paying for the T3 powering this thing? Hmm Google & other private COs. |
|
danza
Premium
join:2002-08-23 | Right out side
of cisco. I am sure this will get a lot of good use. |
|
rodriro
join:2007-05-21
Palo Alto, CA
| That is good news for ExpressNets!
ExpressNets, located in Mountain View CA, can compete against I-Net solutions to provide network design implementation and support. I don't see anything about WiFi on I-Net solutions web page. Which means ExpressNets is a better player for empowering business communities with wireless technologies. |
|
Windogg
join:2002-07-24
Cambridge, MA | Why bother?
Wouldn't it be faster and cheaper just to pay for those 7000 people to get DSL, cable, or a cellular aircard? |
|
