how-to block ads
|
|
view: topics flat text |
|
Comments on news posted 2008-10-29 10:11:13: Qwest released their third quarter earnings this morning, which indicates the company added 61,000 high-speed Internet customers in the quarter (40,000 of them FTTN), compared to the 30,000 broadband customers they added in Q2. ..
|
  RickPremium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT | It's not hard to see where landline customers are going to. The cable co's.
From Comcast's earnings report just out today...
" Meanwhile, Comcast has added 3.1 million customers with voice, Internet and cable television service over the last 12 months. Verizon and AT&T lost a combined 2.9 million of such customers over the same period. "
What a monumental shift that is occurring in the core business of these telco's with their core landlines literally fleeing by the millions.
And, it's not stopping there either...dsl customers are fleeing the telco's as well.
Also from the comcast news out today..
"Comcast added 382,000 broadband customers. For their part, Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and AT&T Inc. (T) combined added only 277,000 high-speed Internet customers. Comcast said 66% of its new broadband customers for the quarter switched from DSL."
I think the big question will be..what happens next with docsis 3.0?
If these companies such as Qwest and AT&T aren't ftth capable ..they just can't keep up.
Verizon at least..has a fighting chance with their FTTH rollout.
Interesting times for sure.
--
The Coyote captured the RR! Roadrunner Rick is now Comcastic! | |
| |  aaronwtPremium
join:2004-11-07
Woodbridge, VA
 ·Verizon FiOS
| Re: It's not hard to see where landline customers are The telcos are at a disadvantage because of taxes. Taxes on my landline from Verizon are almost $12. If I switched to Comcast taxes would be under $2.
This is one of the reasons I'm in the process of dropping my landline and just using my cell number. | |
| | | | | Re: It's not hard to see where landline customers are said by aaronwt:The telcos are at a disadvantage because of taxes. Taxes on my landline from Verizon are almost $12. If I switched to Comcast taxes would be under $2. This is one of the reasons I'm in the process of dropping my landline and just using my cell number. Yeah, I think we'd save roughly $40/mo if we dropped the landline and bumped our wireless minutes up a little bit. | |
| | | RickPremium,MVM
join:2001-02-06
Waterbury, CT | said by aaronwt:The telcos are at a disadvantage because of taxes. Taxes on my landline from Verizon are almost $12. If I switched to Comcast taxes would be under $2. This is one of the reasons I'm in the process of dropping my landline and just using my cell number. I'd venture a guess that bundle pricing is the bigger incentive luring people away. With the triple play products offered it many times allows people to drop their phone costs to about zero for the bundle term.
That and less taxes is a big thing these days.
--
The Coyote captured the RR! Roadrunner Rick is now Comcastic! | |
| | | |  en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Re: It's not hard to see where landline customers are For me (and I suspect many others), it all depends on the bottom line.
TWC gives a good deal at $89 triple play.
AT&T attempts to offer triple play at $90, but then then haven't deployed VoIP, so its null and void.
Taxes/fees aren't that far off between Telco and CableCo. One has lots of taxes/unfees, the other has franchise fees.
Personally, if I had a decent unlimited cellphone plan, I'd drop cable altogether, and use OTA HD.
--
Canada = Hollywood North | |
|
| | roozy
join:2004-09-30
Casper, WY | said by aaronwt:The telcos are at a disadvantage because of taxes. Taxes on my landline from Verizon are almost $12. If I switched to Comcast taxes would be under $2. This is one of the reasons I'm in the process of dropping my landline and just using my cell number. Exactly! The playing field is not level. The telcos are severly regulated and the cable companies are not... If cable and other VOIP providers had to play by the same rules as Qwest, Verizon, AT&T and other telcos, this mass movement of services would not be happening. Some of them would not be able to stay in business if they had to compete fairly.
Either tax and regulate it all, or don't!!! | |
| | | | | | Re: It's not hard to see where landline customers are said by roozy:said by aaronwt:The telcos are at a disadvantage because of taxes. Taxes on my landline from Verizon are almost $12. If I switched to Comcast taxes would be under $2. This is one of the reasons I'm in the process of dropping my landline and just using my cell number. Exactly! The playing field is not level. The telcos are severly regulated and the cable companies are not... If cable and other VOIP providers had to play by the same rules as Qwest, Verizon, AT&T and other telcos, this mass movement of services would not be happening. Some of them would not be able to stay in business if they had to compete fairly. Either tax and regulate it all, or don't!!! QFT! | |
| | | | | | That isn't an either or.
The taxes will come to the VOIP and cable phone. It's inevitable. Most of those phone taxes are local and go directly to the state or municipality you live in. As a result for those taxes to go down or away the system would have to reallocate the tax burden and your property or sales tax or both will have to go up. I doubt that will happen so expect those local phone taxes to show up the cable and VOIP bills. Either that or fire half your police force or DOT. | |
|
| | Sammer
join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA | said by aaronwt:The telcos are at a disadvantage because of taxes. Taxes on my landline from Verizon are almost $12. If I switched to Comcast taxes would be under $2. It's not all taxes, they're called tariffs and a large portion of that $12 goes right back to Verizon. The archaic tariff system for landline phone service should finally be called what it really is, false advertising, and meet its well deserved demise. | |
|
|  dnoyeBFerrous Phallus
join:2000-10-09
Southfield, MI | Most internet users will choose for price not speed. The majority of users dont need the bandwidth. Fiber will only matter if it becomes competitive and one company offers really fast speeds for cheaper than the other company. As it stands, companies are only offering more bandwidth, but not more value.
--
dnoyeB
"Then said I, Wisdom [is] better than strength: nevertheless the poor man's wisdom [is] despised, and his words are not heard. " Ecclesiastes 9:16
| |
|
| | switching this weekend. dont want to switch to comcast, but the upload speeds are faster. qwest uploads speeds are actually getting slower. plus, im tired of getting disconnect notices for being 3 days late in paying the bill on a service that charges me for the month in advance. | |
| |
1 edit | Re: switching this weekend. I would have to say your comment has to rank up there for being completely ignorant. If you cannot even pay your bill on time for being billed in advance. What company would want you as a customer if they billed after the service was used. Sounds like you need to think about more than just your internet and get other things in order first. | |
| | | | | Re: switching this weekend. not ignorant just poor, i now live paycheck to paycheck with my paydays not coresponding to my bills due date. either i pre pay for the month in advance, or risk getting disconnected every month. i have had DSL for 4 years. | |
|
| | 3000/864 for 48$ would never fly 3000/864 for 48$ would never fly when cox offers 12/1 mbps for 44 | |
|
| |
|
