<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Site Feature Requests forum - dslreports.com community</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/nfeatures</link>
<description>Site Feature Requests forum current topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2007, dslreports.com</copyright>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:28:49 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:28:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>



<item>
<title>change the [att=1] feature</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23402390</link>
<description><![CDATA[So that when adding multiple pics or attachments, so you will not need to do [att=1] [att=2]. Maybe something like [att= total 5] for 5 pics ect...

 Edit: it was brought to my attention  by some purple pal of mine that this may not work well with the placement feature so I propose that if you were to use it that the default would be centered without the use of placement.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23402390</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-27 11:07:54</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Can the GBU be recalculated?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23329957</link>
<description><![CDATA[The thought spawned from this thread....

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23328923-Has-the-GBU-tabulation-been-altered

The GBU I feel used to be a good place to go to get a feel for the quality of providers.  What I have noticed in the past is that once a negative review for a provider is posted, some providers then request members to go in and update their reviews, recent or not, to counter the negative review.  At that point the GBU is more of a marketing tool for companies vs a resource for honest reviews.

Thoughts?
--
"So, Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."

Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?  http://www.venganza.org]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23329957</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-12 09:22:01</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Size increase for animated gifs in post...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23332191</link>
<description><![CDATA[Without having to click on them to see the animation. From testing it seems that 900KB or so is the limit. In light of  the size of still images allowed to be uploaded, I think this is a reasonable request.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23332191</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-12 16:01:03</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[easy] Gallery Notification Page</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23349094</link>
<description><![CDATA[I'm not sure whether to post this under Bugs, or Feature Requests, so I figure I'd put it as a request.

When under the Gallery Notification Page: http://www.dslreports.com/instant/10

If one is following several people that post images, and haven't checked it for awhile, it's a bit painful to clear them out.  After you hit delete-this, it then redirects to your main inbox, http://www.dslreports.com/instant?ret= instead of back to the gallery page ( http://www.dslreports.com/instant/10 ).  Thus you either have to hit the gallery notification at the top then click on inbox, or by hitting the back button again to take one back to the gallery notifications to continue deleting the next item.

:) Would it be possible to change that re-direct (if originating from the gallery page), to redirect back to the gallery page after deleting a message?
--
~There is no Normal or Abnormal... Just Diversity.Member of Team Helix - Join Us?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23349094</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-16 13:55:35</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[complaint] Topic preview pop-ups for &#x22;most people now reading&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23346341</link>
<description><![CDATA[Although it is possible to turn off the "Topic preview pop-ups" the choice is not honored when scrolling over the "Most People Now  Reading" items.  

I propose that the choice to turn off topic preview pop-ups be honored for "Most People Now Reading."  These pop-ups are particularly annoying because they appear below the line, may  make the page jump, and are not visible at the bottom of the page.  In a June 2009 suggestion I proposed that these pop-ups be changed so that they would appear above the line which would prevent page jumps and make them all visible.  

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22505447-easy-Move-Most-people-now-reading-balloon-popups

Although this proposal met with almost universal approval, the change was never implemented, so I'm trying again to get this fixed in a different way.

If the powers that be could allow users to simply turn off all preview pop-ups, that would solve the problem.  I believe that most users who have turned off the feature on the main topic list, also do not want it on "Most people now reading..."  
--
This is not a rehearsal.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23346341</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-15 22:15:33</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
