<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Other Manufacturers forum - dslreports.com community</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/othermfg</link>
<description>Other Manufacturers forum current topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2007, dslreports.com</copyright>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:11:38 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:11:38 EDT</lastBuildDate>



<item>
<title>Realtek NIC and Teaming Question</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23387183</link>
<description><![CDATA[I have a MB that has two Realtek NIC (1GB) and software that allows you to team the two chips together using a router or switch.

I have a router so I used that. It works, showing 2GB throughput. The reason I did this is because people are saying that it offers redundancy and thus you're less likely to slow down when downloading, playing games, etc. 

In essence, if you're ISP gives you a maximum bandwidth downstream of 8000Mb/s and you normally can get only anywhere between 3-6000Mb/s, but teaming your cards you could closer to your maximum.

IS this true? If so I don't understand how that can be because everything is above the stack, and if a slowdown occurs while downloading a file, then it is a bottleneck above the stack. 

So I assume, just using some simple logic that the only way this can be true is if it is like two different computers downloading the same file, and both are only getting 4000Mb/s. Thus, if both are getting that bandwidth, you could theoretically double the D/L speed because each connection would be downloading half the file.

That means that your ISP would have to be clean all the way through to its client, and the congestion would have to be above the ISP stack before you could see any benefit.

So can someone explain if I have the idea, or am I totally missing something?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23387183</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-24 02:09:14</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>CheckPoint VPN-1 Wireless Edge W Series Security - EVAL UNIT</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23231940</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi All,

My buddy gave me a Check Point VPN-1 Wireless Edge W Series Security appliiance (router).  This is a brand new unit he got as an eval unit for his company about 2 years ago.  I looked up the problem specs and it is pretty amazing.  The problem with this is that the eval code and product code have expired.  Now I can even get into the unit.  :huh:

I know it is slim chance to get access... unless I pay mucho $$$$ for the activation.  Just want to see if anyone have a suggestion for this.

Thanks in advance.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23231940</guid>
<pubDate>2009-10-23 17:35:15</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[Other] [TrendNet] TEW-432BRP vD1.0 blocking secure sites</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23373595</link>
<description><![CDATA[Dgege

In reply to the problem with 
quote: [TrendNet] TEW-432BRP vD1.0 blocking some secure sites. unquote that was posted some time ago (2002)
you replied the folowing:
quote: Just wanted to say that I flashed the newest rom (found on the Russion site) and it works now! Go ahead, try it. unquote
Can you give me more specifics?  I don't understand what you mean by 'flashed the newest rom'.  I have the problem and would like to try your solution.

Many thanks,
Michael]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23373595</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-20 23:17:27</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
