 jun412
join:2003-04-06
Stevenson Ranch, CA | reply to IhatemyISP
Re: Mozilla > Netscape I love my IE, why should even bother for another IE? Oh security reason? Naw, eat me.
--
Doh!~ |
|
Reviews:
 ·JCOM Cable
| said by jun412:
I love my IE, why should even bother for another IE? Oh security reason? Naw, eat me.
Another IE?
Netscape and Mozilla are not IE.
As for security flaws...all browsers have them.
--
Hacker Beyotches - TP&C - Buy oWn3d a cake |
|
rpsmith
join:2004-04-19
Huntington Beach, CA | reply to jun412
said by jun412:
I love my IE, why should even bother for another IE? Oh security reason? Naw, eat me.
Speed. "Eat me"...hmm, no thanks, you can keep your security holes.  |
|
 TomekPremium
join:2002-01-30
Valley Stream, NY | Speed. i don't think that IE will run faster than firefox on Linux.
IE is integrated into OS, so it's always loaded and here is that "speed". I can say that browser is fast in KDE (Konqueror)
--
Resistance is Futile |
|
jun412
join:2003-04-06
Stevenson Ranch, CA | Tested both of em, they worked pretty much same. (At least in my computer) Except, IE was much faster when I was loading cnet.com (It seems like Mozilla was struggling with web-site layouts and pictures but downloading text was faster). But now, i probably get pretty much same speed since i switched to DSLextreme (6000/608) from Earthlink DSL.
Now, about another IE, I meant Another Internet Browser, my fault.
--
Doh!~ |
|
