Re: mn in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r10086690 en Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:36:32 EDT Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:36:32 EDT Re: mn http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10086690 blazyr :
said by jvigier See Profile:
Makes me wonder if RR has been nuilding this up for a while. Their speed rating numbers for the Phoenix and San Diego area had been abnormally higher than avergae for quite a while before the announcement.

Huh? Phoenix & San Diego are CoxHSI territory - and rest assured not enjoying any panacea of connectivity.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10086690 Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:55:18 EDT Re: mn http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10085021 jvigier : Makes me wonder if RR has been nuilding this up for a while. Their speed rating numbers for the Phoenix and San Diego area had been abnormally higher than avergae for quite a while before the announcement.

There are also quite a few other companies operating cable networks with higher bandwidth (OOL for example). Hopefully this forces the rest of the cable operators to take notice.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10085021 Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:55:00 EDT Re: mn http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10084923 MarkyD :
said by andunn See Profile:
Man, and as soon as other cable and DSL companies start moving and start rolling out 6M service it'll take Charter 1-2 years to catch up :huh: Always one step behind the competition.


Same with Cox.
--
Like Mountain Dew? ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10084923 Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:39:24 EDT Re: mn http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10084709 andunn : Man, and as soon as other cable and DSL companies start moving and start rolling out 6M service it'll take Charter 1-2 years to catch up :huh: Always one step behind the competition.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10084709 Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:05:34 EDT mn http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10084649 ViviTheMage : come to minnesota....]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10084649 Tue, 27 Apr 2004 09:56:24 EDT