http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r10137606 en Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:45:23 EDT Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:45:23 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10137606 StreetSpirit : Lets hope so!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10137606 Mon, 03 May 2004 06:48:41 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10114128 grunt187 : The 1.5/384 should be their new Base package for Residential service. Not sure how they are going to price it for businesses.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10114128 Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:05:29 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10114101 StreetSpirit : I don't really mind 1.5mbit down, it's the 128kbps laughable upstream that lost them this customer.

I would gladly switch back if they offered 1.5/384 for a competitive price. However, if we're talking the old business package (which I had in CT), it was $89 per month, and there was no "residential" tier with anything higher than 128kbps upload.

Could someone please clarify this? Thanks.
David
--
"Defining artistic expression as content is anathema to me." -Courtney Love »dir.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/···dex.html ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10114101 Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:00:55 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10113651 Voyager2K2 : Since you brought it up, VOL should start upgrading this package to 3,000/384.
Compared to the rest of the industry the price they charge for this tier is a rip-off.
There aren't a heck of a lot of customers who opt for this package. It might be a good place to start line upgrades.

CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?????????]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10113651 Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:04:34 EDT