republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


QUICKSILV3R
Premium
join:2002-01-21
San Antonio, TX

1 edit

reply to FFTL

Re: Come on

wow 20Mbps thats nice!


cchhat01
Dr. Zoidberg

join:2001-05-01
Elmhurst, NY

Fat chance

in comparison when AT&T migrated to GSM, the change was supposed to be completed (altogether) by 2001. We know that didn't happen and I know that this won't happen.
There is just not enough motivation in the markets right now.
20Mbps? please!. whats it supposed to cost? $20K (per year maybe). If 3Mbps costs about $40 (avg of dsl getting around 30 bucks and cable around 50), chances are prices won't be fallin to make room for 20mbps.
besides it probably won't be for "end user" by any means. Personally no end user will need this? give me one good reason. and no downloading DVDs is not a good reason and is means to cause more piracy.

Chris
--
Athlon64 3200+, Gigabyte K8NPro, 1GB DDR400 (GeiL), 80GB and 160GB WD HDD (both w/8MB cache), TOSHIBA SD-M1712, NEC 1300A 4x DVD+/-R/RW Drive, ATI RADEON 9800XT, 3xIEEE1394, 6xUSB2.0,RTL8169/8110 GBit LAN


ronpin
Imagine Reality

join:2002-12-06
Nirvana

It looks like a tit-for-tat slow-crawl to higher speeds -- as is happening now with the cable cos. speeding-up to catch the latest DSL speeds. At this rate it looks like incremental speed wars every couple 'o years might get us up to 20mbs in maybe 6-8 years.

I started out on DSL in 1999 at 768kbs -- @Home was 3mbs -- Cable slowed us down to 1.5bs -- DSL now leads at 6mbs -- with Cable starting to match it. About a 6X speed increase over a 5 year period.



whamel
Premium
join:2002-05-09
Clarendon Hills, IL

reply to QUICKSILV3R

Re: Come on

what would you do with 20 mbps, I wouldnt know what to do with such bandwith.
Bill


SpitefulCrow
Insert Witty Tag Here
Premium
join:2003-06-04
Berkeley, CA

reply to ronpin

Re: Fat chance

Except that cable can continue to go higher when current ADSL is going to stop at 8Mbit/1Mbit.
I am not an expert on the various types of head-end equipment for xDSL or cable, but I'm guessing it's easier to split nodes to increase available bandwidth for all the users than it is to replace all of the headend equipment on a DSL system.
--
Powered by Optimum Online
First rule of fiber optics: you do not talk about fiber optics


dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4

reply to QUICKSILV3R

Re: Come on

said by QUICKSILV3R:
wow 20Mbps thats nice!

I can see it now. 20480/128
yawn
enough with download rates already. most know that realworld usage tops out around 2mbps. GIVE US MORE UPLOAD!
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth


75FPS

@verizon.net

reply to whamel
Well, I would be able to work from home, editing digital audio.


attsbcisgay

join:2003-03-18
Beverly Hills, CA

reply to QUICKSILV3R
I don't need 20mbps download with crap 512kbps-1mbps upload. instead, give us 2mb/2mb or 3mb/3mb for a lot less.. I find that the connection is limited by the uploads regardless of download cap, so until then this is all but maketing bs.


Sunday, 27-May 10:02:09 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics