Re: Current speed? in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r10407305 en Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:00:29 EDT Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:00:29 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10408309 JoeOnSunset : Funny Bio, because posting only to correct someone's spelling is something only as a$$ does. So I guess you're in good company.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10408309 Thu, 03 Jun 2004 01:16:24 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10408196 cailyoung : Most big budget films capture in "academy 2K", or basically 2048P. They might rough-cut with 1080i to make display on a TV easier, but generally on-line footage will be in '2K' image files. The data is stored on D1 tapes.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10408196 Thu, 03 Jun 2004 00:57:12 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10407351 Lumberjack : It would make sense to capture and render at the highest quality for a big budget film (at least to me). Once complete it can be easily down converted for film, DVD, streams, etc...
--
My homies is in da hizouse!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10407351 Wed, 02 Jun 2004 23:05:21 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10407305 Corvus : Thanks for the info, maybe you can answer this one: I've heard that 1080i is use in movie industry when working on a movie, anything about that?
--
Jesus saves, but only Buddha makes incremental backups.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10407305 Wed, 02 Jun 2004 23:00:34 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10402530 Xela19115 : Actually it's QAM not QUAM. QAM stands for Quadrature Amplitude Modulation. In one 6 Mhz channel cable company using QAM-256 mode can send 38.8 Mbps of digital video/audio.

Digital video is compressed with MPEG-2 codec. An 1080i HD program can be compressed to a maximum of 19 Mbps (usually it's around 15-16 Mbps). Using QAM-256 mode 2-3 HD channels can be multiplexed. If you use MPEG-4 or WMV9 codecs bandwidth requerement is about 1/2-1/3 of MPEG-2.

1080p HD video if encoded using next generation codecs (MPEG-4) and transmitted using QAM-256 or QAM-1024 -- very doable.

Thing is that there is probably very little noticeable picture quality improvement. If it was like 4096p then of course by all means I want that. But the difference between 1080i and 1080p - is not really worth it.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10402530 Wed, 02 Jun 2004 13:10:57 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10401163 rchandra : hmmm...ordinarily I'd agree with you. But based solely on what's written, "Sattilite" is caplitalized, so it must be a proper noun. , I still don't have a good idea what Sattilite is though. Presumably, it's some high bandwidth way of broadcasting HDTV. Or maybe they're a company that did that intentionally in order to distinguish themselves.
--
English is a difficult enough language to interpret correctly when its rules are followed, let alone when a writer chooses not to follow those rules. Blog is here
Jeopardy! replies REALLY suck!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10401163 Wed, 02 Jun 2004 10:25:15 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10399824 Lumberjack :
said by Kearnstd See Profile:
1.21 Jiggawatts?


Duh. From a vile of plutonium unless of course you are in the past in which case you will need a direct lightning hit at precisely the right time.

Don't you noobs know anything about this computer stuff?
--
My homies is in da hizouse!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10399824 Wed, 02 Jun 2004 03:15:40 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10399774 Kearnstd : 1.21 Jiggawatts?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10399774 Wed, 02 Jun 2004 02:56:46 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10398706 biochemistry : Learn to spell before you make an @$$ of yourself.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10398706 Tue, 01 Jun 2004 23:38:51 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395791 Lumberjack : Thong, tha thong thong thong. Sisqo a go-go.
--
My homies is in da hizouse!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395791 Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:54:33 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395713 pad_34 : Go Sattilite!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395713 Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:46:05 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395139 Corvus : With digital TV it's something else, we are talking of QUAMS, But 3Gbps is a lot. We can usually put few HDTV on a QUAM but a QUAM cannot handle this now. So basically, if you want to broadcast this you need to span the stream on few frequencies.
--
Jesus saves, but only Buddha makes incremental backups.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395139 Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:38:58 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395073 Yoda2009 :
said by Alphy See Profile:
I think we all need that new Sisqo router that does 400 billion jiggabits.

Agreed.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395073 Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:30:29 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395068 Alphy : I think we all need that new Sisqo router that does 400 billion jiggabits.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395068 Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:29:38 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395059 technick : 3 Gbps which is easily confusable with 3Mbps in some third world countries...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395059 Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:28:50 EDT Re: Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395050 Yoda2009 :
said by danza See Profile:
3Mpbs... isn't that already possible with the new dsl/cable speed?

Gbps...lol.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395050 Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:27:24 EDT Current speed? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395048 danza : 3Mpbs... isn't that already possible with the new dsl/cable speed?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10395048 Tue, 01 Jun 2004 17:26:46 EDT