<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Pipe Dream in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r10441752</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:14:07 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:14:07 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Pipe Dream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10450083</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/971598"><b>xp4fibroptic</b></A> : I agree , besides , doesnt anyone relaize that if BPL is allowed to be implimented, it will efectively eliminate HAM radio communications for people like FEMA! There are a long line of very nasty problems with this , that being one of many, its a bad idea plain and simple. Just think of all the do-it-yourslef Tim Taylor types that are gonna electicute themselves to death makin it go faster. Two thumbs down on BPL.<br><br>Still waiting fo the mother ship , , , , Xp4fiberoptic]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10450083</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 05:32:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Pipe Dream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10450081</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/971598"><b>xp4fibroptic</b></A> : I agree , besides , doesn't anyone realize that if BPL is allowed to be implemented, it will effectively eliminate HAM radio communications for people like FEMA! There are a long line of very nasty problems with this , that being one of many, its a bad idea plain and simple. Just think of all the do-it-yourself Tim Taylor types that are gonna electrocute themselves to death making it go faster. Two thumbs down on BPL.<br><br>Still waiting fo the mother ship , , , , Xp4fiberoptic]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10450081</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 05:32:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Pipe Dream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10447335</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/904806"><b>Corvus</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  macmouse <A HREF="/useremail/u/637997"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Its not quite clear... it will definitely be something like cable (where the bandwith is shared in your block). The highest I've seen is 54mbits from a press-release (&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ebusinessforum.com/index.asp?doc_id=7041&layout=rich_story" >www.ebusinessforum.com/index.asp&middot;&middot;&middot;ch_story</A>) shared across all customers. So, calculate that as you will. The current one's are offering, 512kbits (symetrical?) service at the moment.<br><br> Not to mention, that there *are* distance limitations as well just like DSL, except they are even shorter. Also, because the equipment is experimental/new it also costs a lot more to deploy. So you get the negative of both cable/dsl in one service, yay! <br><br>I admit, there are some area's that only have power (no phone or cable) but those are few and far between. Definitely not profitable markets..Well, over the short term anyway.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Wow, shared bandwith limitations like cable and distance issues like DSL? My god, it's the best of two worlds. :D<br><SMALL>--<br>Jesus saves, but only Buddha makes incremental backups.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10447335</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 21:16:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Same Price and Same Speed?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10444667</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/939205"><b>karlj1</b></A> : Heck if that's the case I'd jump on board BPL in a New York minute.  I'll admit, it may take a while to get a comparable offering.  But once it's there, I'm all for it.<br><br>My take on this is forced bundling.  Most phone companies force you to get a phone line in order to get DSL.  Most cable companies force you to get at least basic cable in order to get their broadband.  <br><br>As for BPL, don't know too many people that will want to cancel their power service.  :D  If anything BPL will force the Phone and cable companies to abandon forced bundling.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10444667</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 16:14:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Pipe Dream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10442888</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/264881"><b>technick</b></A> : that's just plan crazy]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10442888</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:21:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Pipe Dream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10442655</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/637997"><b>macmouse</b></A> : Its not quite clear... it will definitely be something like cable (where the bandwith is shared in your block). The highest I've seen is 54mbits from a press-release (&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ebusinessforum.com/index.asp?doc_id=7041&layout=rich_story" >www.ebusinessforum.com/index.asp&middot;&middot;&middot;ch_story</A>) shared across all customers. So, calculate that as you will. The current one's are offering, 512kbits (symetrical?) service at the moment.<br><br> Not to mention, that there *are* distance limitations as well just like DSL, except they are even shorter. Also, because the equipment is experimental/new it also costs a lot more to deploy. So you get the negative of both cable/dsl in one service, yay! <br><br>I admit, there are some area's that only have power (no phone or cable) but those are few and far between. Definitely not profitable markets..Well, over the short term anyway.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10442655</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 11:47:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Pipe Dream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10441975</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/732594"><b>ronpin</b></A> : 1/3 of existing Cable or DSL customers are ignorant of the issue (and I'm being generous)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10441975</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:04:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Pipe Dream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10441926</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/919962"><b>oranges3</b></A> : is it any faster? i mean by the time it's gonna come around taiwan, fiber optic'll be up. :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10441926</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:52:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Pipe Dream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10441752</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/752713"><b>cjynx</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  Monster Rain <A HREF="/useremail/u/667905"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>1/3 of existing cable or DSL customers would switch??  <B>BS</B><br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>They only asked 3 people and one of them said that they might switch leading to their 1/3. ha ha]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10441752</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:26:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Pipe Dream</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10441737</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/667905"><b>Monster Rain</b></A> : 1/3 of existing cable or DSL customers would switch??  <B>BS</B>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10441737</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:23:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
