<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: 4Mbps in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r10608667</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:05:09 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:05:09 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10622269</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/583467"><b>Kompressor</b></A> : I'd rather see 3Mbps down and 1Mbps up.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10622269</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:59:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10616048</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/400234"><b>yaesumofo</b></A> : About 5 or 6 months ago I received a message from comcast about my excessive use of IP numbers. They suggested that I either put all the stuff behind a router or get home networking. I opted for home networking simply for the extra speed. They didn't come out and do anything. Nothing changed except that my speed went up and they give me 5 ip's.<br>I have been on the cable modem thing for a long time (since the beginning). When ALL of my buddies were getting killed by low DSL speed's and crappy DSL service my cable modem connection just worked perfect. It still is.<br>Go comcast go !!UP that speed!!!<br>Yaesumofo]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10616048</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2004 14:58:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10612349</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/817585"><b>jkhunter</b></A> : Comcast ups their download speed only to cancel your account due to bandwidth overusage. The last price hike In Dallas Texas was to employ 500 more employees to handle the calls from subscibers complaining about their high prices. :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10612349</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2004 00:02:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10612164</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/558803"><b>paulhaskew</b></A> : hehe, he did not its wAy OT... :P]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10612164</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 23:40:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10610525</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I'm inclined to think that its more than just my neighbors; I've seen multiple posts in the Comcast forum complaining about the speeds going to shit in LA during the peak hours.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10610525</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 20:11:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10609223</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/958747"><b>camera_man</b></A> : Ditto.....I can't even get the 3000/256 here on a consistant basis.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10609223</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:27:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10609137</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/590956"><b>TrueAudio</b></A> : Isnt this thread about Comcast's upgrade speeds?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10609137</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:15:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10609037</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/314099"><b>wheelzoff</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by dotditdot:</SMALL><HR>I couldn't agree more.  They can't even deliver 3/.256 consistently.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>In a few areas that is true, but looking at the speed test archive it looks like they do a good job of offering 3/256 speeds to a great deal of customers.  It does suck though if you are in one of the areas where the 3/256 cap is just a fantasy.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.lpunderground.com">Linkin Park Underground</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10609037</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:05:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10608839</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/556739"><b>LBDSL</b></A> : OK, Sorry to have taken this way OT, but to clarify.<br><br>We (LB DSL) have just launched an ADSL product that does NOT require voice service, we can provide this ANYwhere we currently offer ADSL (43 states).<br><br>Yes the cost is more then our line share products, because we have to pay the ILEC for the copper. Yes the install is more, because it MUST be a pro-install, since the line is brand new.<br><br>We have launched one speed right now 1.5/384 with faster speeds coming in late summer.<br><br>Here is some basic info &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,10568933~mode=flat">NEW ADSL option, without voice service</A><br><br>Now, lets get back on topic of Cable 4mbps<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://LBTech.com">Lightning Bolt Technologies</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10608839</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:43:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10608796</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856950"><b>jap</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by dotditdot:</SMALL><HR>I'm in LA, and every evening the network goes down the drain.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>  That is, as you may know, merely a capacity problem in your immediate neighborhood.  Comcrap can & will deploy more capacity if users in your region complain.  Start complaining.  Thoughput depressions like the one you describe are often caused by a small number (2-10) of identifiable users (read: neighbors) who are file trading.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10608796</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:40:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10608750</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856950"><b>jap</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  LBDSL <A HREF="/useremail/u/556739"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR> "dry" ADSL is here ;)<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>"here" where?  I'm in NH (one of the supposedly "dry" DSL regions) and all the media scuttlebutt sez it's here, but Verizon sez it's not - nor do they "know" anything about it.  For now it's hogwash unless you *already* have wet DSL and want to migrate your hardline voice to Verizon's wireless service.  That's not dry DSL, that's swap your hardline for our mobile service *contract* because that's how Verizon can stem the loss of customers.<br><br>For people like me who were forced to drop Verizon-everything *specifically* because they refused to unbundle are now locked into other-mobile + other-compconnect services.  Verizon continues to really fock up this aspect of their business.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10608750</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:35:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10608667</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Although I think its awesome that you're doing that, $65/month is too much in my book for 1.5/.4.  If the prices were the same as the ones requiring a land line, then I'd seriously consider it.<br><br>At that price its cheaper for me to get a landline and get the cheapest metered service, which typically amounts to ~$15/month after taxes.<br><br>Is the $100 install as well as $100 modem required??]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10608667</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:25:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10608174</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/556739"><b>LBDSL</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by dotditdot:</SMALL><HR>Not for me, I'm in the unfortunate situation of living a few blocks too far, and am in SBC (& Comcast) territory (instead of Verizon & Time Warner)<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>We now offer Dry ADSL nationwide, even if you have SBC :)<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://LBTech.com">Lightning Bolt Technologies</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10608174</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:39:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10608053</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I'm in LA, and every evening the network goes down the drain.  Speeds are rotten during standard evening hours.  If I hop on later at night or early morning on a weekend, the speeds are normal / fine.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10608053</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:28:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10608025</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Not for me, I'm in the unfortunate situation of living a few blocks too far, and am in SBC (& Comcast) territory (instead of Verizon & Time Warner)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10608025</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:25:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10607813</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/850558"><b>Rejected One</b></A> : the home networking refers to the router/modem (gateway) to connect more then one computer in the house. its different from the regular residential service where we only hook the one pc. <br> <br><SMALL>--<br><B>Tech-4Hire - 100% Geek</B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10607813</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:06:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10607538</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1030475"><b>Ronnie1055</b></A> : Ditto... my 3000/256 speeds are very consistant.  I generally average 3200/236.  I have been as high as 3400/248 but haven't seen that in a while.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10607538</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:43:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10607333</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627528"><b>innoman</b></A> : i have pretty consistent speeds close to 3000/256.  Actually usually closer to 3200/243.  When I had aDSL I only got 1100/102 when advertised was 1500/128.  <br><SMALL>--<br>Formerly Innobabe79</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10607333</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:24:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10606339</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/556739"><b>LBDSL</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by dotditdot:</SMALL><HR>I'd go with dsl if I didn't have to have a landline as well..<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>"dry" ADSL is here ;)<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://LBTech.com">Lightning Bolt Technologies</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10606339</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:40:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10606231</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I couldn't agree more.  They can't even deliver 3/.256 consistently.<br><br>I'd go with dsl if I didn't have to have a landline as well..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10606231</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:28:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10606154</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/965404"><b>CameraAssist</b></A> : What exactly is the "Home Networking" feature?<br><br>I pay $43 for 3000/256, but I don't remember anything about it being a Home Networking plan.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10606154</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:19:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>4Mbps</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10606028</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/382990"><b>jdir</b></A> : Gee, I can't even get a reliable 3Mbps and 256Kbps up.<br><br>Maybe Comcast should just advertise 10Mbps and not deliver]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,10606028</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:05:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
