site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1185
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


rf_engineer

join:2003-08-04
USA

reply to MazakGuy7

Re: I'm always amazed ...

said by MazakGuy7:
Then the fcc should just stop issuing ham licenses. Then we just have to wait awhile, then there will be NO one to complain about interference.

You'll have to go to the ITU and convince some 200 other countries to stop issuing licenses as well ( »www.iaru.org/statsum00.html ). After that, you'll need to tackle the other 90% of HF spectrum users which are the government, military, ships, and planes, among others.

It might be easier to deploy a technology that doesn't interfere.


Radio Active
My pappy's a pistol
Premium
join:2003-01-31
Fullerton, CA

1 edit

reply to rf_engineer
Question: Are you aware of any ingress protection schema designed into BPL?

Hams and CBers with high-power transmitters might almost assuredly disrupt BPL connectivity. (I am both, although I have no high power equipment)

Any thoughts?
--
"Maybe" is twice as good as "No", but only half as good as "Yes"... »www.folsomtech.com


Sunday, 27-May 10:22:32 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics