site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA

reply to jc100

Re: BOOO

Exactly what did the story have to do with Republicans? I'll admit that I'm a Democrat and want to see Bush out of office, but how does "MPAA Gets a New Chief... lawsuit possibility is open" = "Bush's fault"? This is a problem with the DCMA which was passed in 1998 (Clinton's tenure) by both Republicans and Democrats. The blame for the DCMA (and some organizations' abuses of it) doesn't fall on one particular political party.
--
-Jason Levine
http://www.jasons-toolbox.com/
http://www.PCQandA.com/
http://www.urateit.com/


snipper_cr
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Wheaton, IL

Im more curious what a new MPAA cheif has to do with Iraq!



Omega
Displaced Ohioan
Premium
join:2002-07-30
Cheyenne, WY

reply to Jason Levine

said by Jason Levine:
I'll admit that I'm a Democrat and want to see Bush out of office, but how does "MPAA Gets a New Chief... lawsuit possibility is open" = "Bush's fault"?
Well, duh, everything to the libreal is Bush's fault.

I also fail to see how Bush relates to any of this.
--
Bush 2004
My site
SBC DSL 2650/384


Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA

Did you read my post? That "I'm a Democrat and want to see Bush out of office" was a preface. I might not like Bush, but I don't blame him for all of our problems and certainly not for the current RIAA/DCMA situation. As far as political blame for that goes, it lands on both sides of the aisle. Both Republicans and Democrats voted for it and Clinton was the one who signed it into law. Yes, I liked Clinton as president, but he was far from perfect (obviously ) and the DCMA isn't exactly a shining moment in his career. Of course, the more immediate blame lands on the RIAA's shoulders. Bush really has little to no relevance to this situation.
--
-Jason Levine
http://www.jasons-toolbox.com/
http://www.PCQandA.com/
http://www.urateit.com/



Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA

reply to snipper_cr

said by snipper_cr:
Im more curious what a new MPAA cheif has to do with Iraq!

Were there Weapons of Mass File Sharing?

jsouth
Jsouth

join:2000-12-12
Wichita, KS

reply to Jason Levine
He was being sarcastic.



Omega
Displaced Ohioan
Premium
join:2002-07-30
Cheyenne, WY

reply to Jason Levine
Sorry, I was talking about Jsouth's theory of how this is Bush's fault, but I was using your quote. I should have explained myself more. But I was being sarcastic.
--
Bush 2004
My site
SBC DSL 2650/384


Cyron

join:2002-09-24
Charlotte, NC

reply to Jason Levine
I'm neither a Dem or Rep, but I completely agree with your statement. Both parties are responsible. After a politician gets elected, from President on down, they only have one job; to get re-elected. And what they need to get re-elected ironically is not votes, but campaign money. In the past, the person with the most campaign contributions usually wins. Until this changes, you'll always see a sign on the politician saying "for sale", or in the case of Orrin Hatch, "Sold".


Sunday, 27-May 06:16:10 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics