site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Links: ·Forum Rules ·Forum FAQ ·FTP Modes & Ports ·Linksys Home
AuthorAll Replies

kkapoor

join:2003-09-07

1 edit

reply to viper54g

Re: Somebody's getting to big for their britches

In that case then Linksysinfo is not allowed to distribute the Satori firmware without also hosting the source code. This is in violation of the GPL.

This is the same thing that Sveasoft was accusing 'that other guy', who had posted the Alchemy firmware, of doing. (i.e. Distributing the Alchemy firmware without the source code)

This seems completely duplicitous to me.

These are the criteria that need to be met for a GPL distribution:

* Does the distribution contain a copy of the License?
* Does it clearly state which software is covered by the License? Does it say anything misleading, perhaps giving the impression that something is covered by the License when in fact it is not?
* Is source code included in the distribution?
* Is a written offer for source code included with a distribution of just binaries?
* Is the available source code complete, or is it designed for linking in other non-free modules?

linksysOLD

join:2002-03-15
NI

1 edit

said by kkapoor:
In that case then Linksysinfo is not allowed to distribute the Satori firmware without also hosting the source code. This is in violation of the GPL.

if you get your facts right linksysinfo doesn't distribute it:) we link firmware downloads to another site:) i'll link the source code if you link but that will only be on the same source as sveasofts:) hahaha

--
Regards, Simon


www.linksysinfo.org

WRT54G v2.0 (Alchemy-pre5.1 v2.07.1.8sv Firmware)

kkapoor

join:2003-09-07

2 edits


if you get your facts right linksysinfo doesn't distribute it we link firmware downloads to another site i'll link the source code if you link but that will only be on the same source as sveasofts hahaha

Part of quote removed. ~sorto'



Hey, there is no need to get nasty. If you read my posts, I was seeking clarifications and trying to provide information based on the actual GPL license. It was not a designed as a criticism of your site. Your site provides an excellent service.

This is exactly the kind of nonconstructive reaction that we don't require in the open source community.

Please keep personal attacks out of the threads.

Sunday, 27-May 06:11:59 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics