<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Anti-Spam Blacklists Wrong in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r11266875</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:47:02 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:47:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Anti-Spam Blacklists Wrong</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11266875</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/625141"><b>pnh102</b></A> : These blacklists were wrong to list any single non-spamming IP address as "blocked."  Even if a spammer's sending IP address is one bit away from a non-spammer, there is no reason whatsoever for the non-spammer to be listed.  Hopefully this kind of legal action will teach these idiot vigilantes to think before they take actions that cause so many problems for innocent bystanders.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.swiftvets.com">www.swiftvets.com</A><BR><A HREF="http://michaelmoorehatesamerica.com">9/11 was the best thing to happen to Michael Moore</A><BR>Win another one for the Gipper!  <A HREF="http://www.georgewbush.com">Bush/Cheney 2004</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11266875</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2004 11:01:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
