 pcscdmaChocobo Chocobo Random BattlePremium
join:2004-01-14
Winterset, IA
1 edit | Regulate or not? quote:
In the comments, Nuvio asserts that broadband Internet access providers, who also offer VoIP services, have economic incentives to discriminate against unaffiliated VoIP providers in favor of affiliated providers. If left unregulated, this discrimination will endanger the vibrant competition that currently exists in the VoIP market and ultimately harm consumers.
So what do VoIP providers want? Regulation or not? I wish they would just make up their mind on this.
--
I registered on DSLReports/BroadbandReports to talk about Broadband and DSL. Did you see GWReports or JKReports because I sure as hell didn't. Enough with the political bullshitting already.
Free Kevin |
|
| they want regulation of the broadband industry... |
|
 calvoiper
join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA | reply to pcscdma
said by pcscdma:
So what do VoIP providers want? Regulation or not? I wish they would just make up their mind on this.
In the words of a famous economist, Alfred Kahn, "Deregulation does not mean you fire the policeman."
In other words, saying you want an unregulated marketplace doesn't mean that the competition should be free to burn down your plant or engage in a boycott--it just means that the "economic regulation" regarding rates, offerings, and terms of service isn't needed. In most all areas, non-discrimination is one of the requirements which remains after deregulation.
I, for one, feel that requiring ISPs to be content neutral (unless otherwise requested by the subscriber, such as blocking porn) is a good idea. It's hardly "regulation" in the utility sense. It's more akin to traditional antitrust enforcement.
Calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies! |
|
