<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Who said they are regulating the spectrum? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r11350571</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:36:34 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:36:34 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Who said they are regulating the spectrum?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11350571</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/687799"><b>rengaw03</b></A> : Who said they were regulating the spectrum?  They did.<br><br>University of Texas was banning <I>all</I> wireless routers and access points, regardless of whose network they were part of.  In short, they were creating a forbidden use of the 2.4GHz spectrum, or in other words, regulating it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11350571</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:24:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Who said they are regulating the spectrum?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11349954</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1077205"><b>amdfanboy</b></A> : They could just ban routers and AP's. Last time I checked, those were wern't classified as the "2.4GHz spectrum". Anyway...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11349954</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 18:16:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
