http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r11490189 en Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:03:09 EDT Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:03:09 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11490583 Bill_MI : By the political climate I mean Microsoft will be in the business of pick-n-choose what and how they report "spyware".

Anyone that loves or hates Microsoft can agree they are damned-if-they-do and damned-if-they-don't on a constant basis. Too constant to be effective in spyware detection.

Hehe... The comments are already showing my point. :-)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11490583 Sun, 03 Oct 2004 12:46:32 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11490246 Mike : I agree kind of. If Gator sued Lavasoft.. imagine what slime are going to sue Microsoft.

I wonder what the loop holes will be to get on the 'ignore' list or will they shock me and be another S&D clone. ;-)
--
I call for a separation of church and idiot. - Lewis Black
What this country needs is a good five dollar plasma weapon.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11490246 Sun, 03 Oct 2004 11:53:36 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11490189 Bill_MI : Spyware detection *has* to be independent. I don't think Microsoft has the ability to be independent with their political climate. It will be interesting to watch the definition of spyware "evolve".]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11490189 Sun, 03 Oct 2004 11:45:47 EDT