<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: TV still sucks. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r11515558</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:15:15 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:15:15 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: TV still sucks.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11516231</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/262888"><b>Yowzaaah</b></A> : <BLOCKQUOTE>Couldn't you say the same thing about the Internet - 95% is total crap. Of course, much like tv, the 5% that you do not feel is crap is why you subscribe.</BLOCKQUOTE><br><br><B>Well.......that and the p0rn.</B>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11516231</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:38:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: TV still sucks.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515590</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  joebear29 <A HREF="/useremail/u/843547"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>The comparison is valid for the point I was making - both mediums have large amounts of crap, but enough "quality" so that people generally subscribe.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>How about suffice to say we disagree on that point.  But as you say there is enough "quality" for enough people to subscribe.<br><SMALL>--<br>"Affluence separates people. Poverty knits 'em together. You got some sugar and I don't; I borrow some of yours. Next month you might not have any flour; well, I'll give you some of mine." - Ray Charles&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cafepress.com/maxolasersquad" >www.cafepress.com/maxolasersquad</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515590</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:02:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: TV still sucks.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515558</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843547"><b>joebear29</b></A> : The comparison is valid for the point I was making - both mediums have large amounts of crap, but enough "quality" so that people generally subscribe.<br><br>Of course, everyone's definition of quality is different.  If there were no other channels, I would get satellite just for ESPN and HBO, but others consider those channels worthless.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515558</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:57:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: TV still sucks.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515536</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  joebear29 <A HREF="/useremail/u/843547"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Couldn't you say the same thing about the Internet - 95% is total crap.<br><br>Of course, much like tv, the 5% that you do not feel is crap is why you subscribe.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Yes, but the internet is an entirely different medium.  I don't feel the two can be compared.<br>One thing I was thinking that may come good out of this, is since there is limited bandwidth maybe they would have an option do purchase just the channels you wants.  So I could order only Fox for Simpsons, and King of the Hill, Cartoon Channel, IFC, SCI-FI, Weather Channel, CNN, and just a few others and not be forced to pay for channels in a bundle I will never watch or ever want to watch.  This would increase my chance of buying pay-for-tv programing.<br><SMALL>--<br>"Affluence separates people. Poverty knits 'em together. You got some sugar and I don't; I borrow some of yours. Next month you might not have any flour; well, I'll give you some of mine." - Ray Charles&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cafepress.com/maxolasersquad" >www.cafepress.com/maxolasersquad</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515536</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:54:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: TV still sucks.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515532</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548921"><b>reub2000</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  nixen <A HREF="/useremail/u/698757"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  joebear29 <A HREF="/useremail/u/843547"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Couldn't you say the same thing about the Internet - 95% is total crap.<br><br>Of course, much like tv, the 5% that you do not feel is crap is why you subscribe.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>Yup. I get cable because of:<UL><br>&#8226;NHL Centre Ice (though, not this year)<br>&#8226;Toonami<br>&#8226;Adult Swim<br>&#8226;Discovery Channel networks</UL><br>The rest, I pretty much never watch.<br><br>-tom<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>The channels I watch:<br>-Commedy Central<br>-Adult Swim<br>-History Channel]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515532</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:53:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: TV still sucks.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515399</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/698757"><b>nixen</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by  joebear29 <A HREF="/useremail/u/843547"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><HR>Couldn't you say the same thing about the Internet - 95% is total crap.<br><br>Of course, much like tv, the 5% that you do not feel is crap is why you subscribe.<br> <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>Yup. I get cable because of:<UL><br>&#8226;NHL Centre Ice (though, not this year)<br>&#8226;Toonami<br>&#8226;Adult Swim<br>&#8226;Discovery Channel networks</UL><br>The rest, I pretty much never watch.<br><br>-tom<br><SMALL>--<br>"Some people have morals, standards and ideals about quality, but I'm an American: I couldn't care less." --Tony Pierce (paraphrased)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515399</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:37:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: TV still sucks.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515361</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843547"><b>joebear29</b></A> : Couldn't you say the same thing about the Internet - 95% is total crap.<br><br>Of course, much like tv, the 5% that you do not feel is crap is why you subscribe.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515361</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:32:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>TV still sucks.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515334</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : Doesn't matter how it's delivered 95% of TV is pure crap aimed at people who have the sense of humor of a moron.<br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by Weird Al Yankovic:</SMALL><HR>Now why did I ever pay for this junk?<br>I hooked up eighty channels and each one stunk<br>Just brainless blood and guts, and mindless T & A<br>It's awful, it's putrid, it's crummy, it's stupid, gonna throw my set away<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Just my negative opinion.<br><SMALL>--<br>"Affluence separates people. Poverty knits 'em together. You got some sugar and I don't; I borrow some of yours. Next month you might not have any flour; well, I'll give you some of mine." - Ray Charles&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cafepress.com/maxolasersquad" >www.cafepress.com/maxolasersquad</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515334</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:28:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
