site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
55
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

IanR

join:2001-03-22
Madison, NJ

1 edit

TWC don't get it...

..They appear to want to offer ONLY thru some kind of closed end system which raises the costs. Unless there is some FCC Law against it why can't they just offer a range of Tv Channels whcih the consumer and pick from and pay p.m. Then the user could tune in via a media PC? I am sure that this is the way to go rather than trying to shift some protected and expensive BOX.
I like many others already get a pretty fast broadband service so why attach it to only an ADSL2+ roll-out?

HSD4490

join:2001-08-26
Matthews, NC

TWC isn't going anywhere. I think everyone is forgetting that Time Warner controls about 80% of all media on this planet, ranging from music, movies, television and print.

Even if the Bells did get this stuff working, they will have to pay for content. Guess who owns a shitload of that content.

Want HBO...TW...want CNN...TW...etc...

They will only enrich the coffers of Time Warner....the Bells are so finished...it's just a matter of time.


Sunday, 27-May 11:18:42 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics