site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


SRFireside

join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX

reply to bodysurf

Re: Can't blame them...

You got it all turned around. SBC and the other Bells AGREED to past regulation. They weren't forced to do anything. Also the Bells have yet to have gotten "screwed" on the deal either. They are still reporting much more profit than cost in spite of having to share their lines.

I would very much like the government to come in and "fiberize" the nation, then lease the lines to providers. The thing is SBC and the other Bells are very much against it... unless you haven't heard about all the municipal fiber cases that have been talked about on BBR.

The Bells thought they had a good deal sharing their lines and getting an advantage on long distance. What they didn't anticipate was broadband and DSL (this is in spite of them having the technology for about a decade and sitting on it). The Bells figured on milking ISDN and T1 for another decade or so but the CLEC's knew better and jumped on the DSL route. Now the Bells are crying foul because their master plan didn't go like they thought. Though.

The Bells made their bed. Let them lie in it.

Sunday, 27-May 11:19:44 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics