republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Tikker_LoS

join:2004-04-29
Regina, SK

reply to KrK

Re: Big Bells are back!!!

said by KrK:
What sucks is they are REALLY saying "Grant us long-term monopoly control over our service areas. Garauntee to us that consumers won't have a choice and will have to pay what we say. Then we'll think about acting in people's best interests, but most importantly, for our own future greed."

No

what they're saying is that if someone else wants to offer the same service, that company can plow their own fiber

then you can choose which one you'd like to use

What they're trying to avoid is investing $xxxxxx and then having someone force them to allow competitors to use the fiber at less than cost


SRFireside

join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX

To those of you who keep saying if competitors want fiber they should build their own. Tell me... how many times will you accept having your yard dug up for every competitor to lay that fiber? Tell me... how easy do you think it will be for competitors to get the same rights of way to even do the digging that the Bells have (that's a loaded question because the chances are VERY low on getting them).

ONE line dug once. LEASE the line to providers. DON'T own the line and be a provider as well (conflict of interest). That is the best option.



DrTCP
Yours truly
Premium,ExMod 1999-04
join:1999-11-09
Round Rock, TX

reply to Tikker_LoS

said by Tikker_LoS:
what they're saying is that if someone else wants to offer the same service, that company can plow their own fiber
Bell's already have right of way to deploy their fiber while CLECs do not have that and obtaining right of way rights is not an easy task. This alone makes Bell's levereging their own incumbent position in monopolistic ways. The cost of deployment for CLECs will be higher so they cannot compete with ILEC in any viable way.

Besides, what sounds good on paper does not sound good in reality. There will be a huge amount of infrastructure wasted because a home will only use one of the two choices.

BosstonesOwn

join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA

reply to SRFireside
Why dig poles work fine for a lot of the cable companies area's.



KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service

reply to Tikker_LoS

said by Tikker_LoS:
No

what they're saying is that if someone else wants to offer the same service, that company can plow their own fiber
That sounds great on paper--- or in this case, on text.... but how many other companies will have right of ways? Easements through private and public property? Special consideration? Nope. Therefore, it won't happen.

The Bells are keenly aware their only advantage over competition is leveraging their infrastructure. They want to make sure it stays that way. This is why they fight municipal broadband tooth and nail.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)

Tikker_LoS

join:2004-04-29
Regina, SK

said by KrK:
said by Tikker_LoS:
No

what they're saying is that if someone else wants to offer the same service, that company can plow their own fiber
That sounds great on paper--- or in this case, on text.... but how many other companies will have right of ways? Easements through private and public property? Special consideration? Nope. Therefore, it won't happen.

The Bells are keenly aware their only advantage over competition is leveraging their infrastructure. They want to make sure it stays that way. This is why they fight municipal broadband tooth and nail.

Of course the infrastructure is their big advantage

It'd be like buying a lot, erecting a building and selling hamburgers

then having city council tell you that you have to allow a rival company counterspace in your building to sell their burgers (which are really your burgers, just with a different wrapper)

Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

That's a poor example considering there are virtually no barriers to you building your own building.

Nice try though.



SRFireside

join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX

reply to BosstonesOwn

said by BosstonesOwn:
Why dig poles work fine for a lot of the cable companies area's.

I don't think poles will work for a fiber line. Too many things can go wrong since fiber lines are much more fragile than cable. If hanging fiber was viable somebody would have been doing it by now.

lvas

join:2001-05-17
Glen Carbon, IL

reply to DrTCP

right of ways are not the issue

REALLLLY have you ever heard of WI-MAX? there are lots of ways to deploy broadband solutions. you just have to be willing to spend your OWN money.


boogie74

join:2001-06-19
Neenah, WI

reply to Skippy25

Re: Big Bells are back!!!

said by Skippy25:
That's a poor example considering there are virtually no barriers to you building your own building.

Nice try though.

Sure there are. It's cost prohibitive if you don't own or have access to land. Also, there are zoning requirements that current restaurant owners already comply with that I would have to apply for and purchase licences for.

It's simply not possible for me- no money! But a business owner already has the cash for it- it's no fair!


DrTCP
Yours truly
Premium,ExMod 1999-04
join:1999-11-09
Round Rock, TX

reply to lvas

Re: right of ways are not the issue

said by lvas:
REALLLLY have you ever heard of WI-MAX? there are lots of ways to deploy broadband solutions. you just have to be willing to spend your OWN money.

First, WI-MAX is not out there yet. It is still on the drawing board and a lot of power point ware.

Secondly, we are talking about fiber (huge pipe). Wi-Max or any wireless technology is not capable of delivering what a fiber to the premise could do.

With fiber you will start to get HDTV and other high bandwdith video services delivered to your home in addition to mere internet connection.

It is not the same thing!


azbcvfedwr

@stlsmo.swbell.ne

reply to Tikker_LoS

Re: Big Bells are back!!!

Correct, the Big Bells must pony up the cash for the upgrades and maintain the existing infrastructure at the same time. I can fully understand not wanting to be forced to lease the fiber at less than what it will cost to maintain it. Their investment must be protected otherwise why make the investment.


John Galt
Forward, March
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
kudos:3

reply to SRFireside
Fiber is hanging all over the place...it is really rather more robust than most people think.

It has come a long way from the fragile glass fibers of yesteryear.

It is really not an issue, as such.


BosstonesOwn

join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
Reviews:
·Comcast

said by John Galt:
Fiber is hanging all over the place...it is really rather more robust than most people think.

It has come a long way from the fragile glass fibers of yesteryear.

It is really not an issue, as such.

Thanks for enforcing my point.
--
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"

Sunday, 27-May 11:20:16 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics