| Getiting it clear Okay so then if a CLEC also wants the floor space in the bell office then is that okay? I know that they do it and it is forced by government. Now as far as leasing fiber to CLEC's don't agree with that either, let them build there own structure, where were they when the bells were building the structure and then wait bell's maintain it not the CLEC's so yes they shouldn't be forced to lease them to other at a reduced rate. Now as far as cable broadband there is another interesting bag of crap, there service is considered "entertainment" but bell is considered a communications medium and is held to a different set of rules. Now when I look at it seems if you send data both ways it becomes a communications medium and is not longer just entertainment and should be using the same rules such as leasing to other CLEC's to provides service? and they don't of course it would have to be at a reduced rate. |
|
| said by brownsbranch:
Okay so then if a CLEC also wants the floor space in the bell office then is that okay? I know that they do it and it is forced by government.
And if the building is full the ILEC must build on to provide space for the CLEC that is wanting to co-locate. |
|
 JakCrow
join:2001-12-06
Palo Alto, CA | said by Shadow01:
said by brownsbranch:
Okay so then if a CLEC also wants the floor space in the bell office then is that okay? I know that they do it and it is forced by government.
And if the building is full the ILEC must build on to provide space for the CLEC that is wanting to co-locate.
Do you have sources to back up your claim? |
|
