http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r11524370 en Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:52:35 EDT Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:52:35 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11581543 coop_dog : We need FFTH right away there is no time to spare. Not to solve our slow download speeds of 4 and 5 mb/s, not to bring new services to out house, not to give us an alternate for tv and internet, but to make everyone shut the F^k up about fiber on every forum. Man we know it would be nice, lets get over it.

Mike Cooper]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11581543 Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:39:21 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11524370 Xoroz : SBC has been trying to push fiber to homes for speeds of 25mbps. Their initial project was for 5 years but today they pressure FCC, they do not want to share the cable, and then they would deploy it in 2 or 3 years. ( »story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=s···95573503 )
I believe once our internet speed goes up to 25mpbs we will have no need for telephone lines or TV sets.
Internet will link all of the world for free, well at the mothly fee of your ISP. I think SBC is very smart on doing this, the first one to get the fiber to homes will get that monthly fee, hence will secure their share in the market. Because if TELCOs donīt look ahead they will die, just take a look at what SKYPE ( »www.skype.com plans are. Then imagine a little higher once we get WiMAX ( »www.wimaxforum.org/about ) instead of Wi-FI.
Then will just have wireless tools all over our uniforms.
The cars will have internet, the watch will have internet, it will all be linked. I predict about 5 years for this to come true, just watch and see.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11524370 Thu, 07 Oct 2004 10:40:37 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11517647 Tikker_LoS : I've had it for 6+ months now

If you walked in and turned on the TV, you wouldn't know it wasn't Cable or satellite

HDTv will require ADSL2 for sure, but 6.5 mb is more than enough bandwidth for regular tv]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11517647 Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:33:59 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11517538 Doctor Olds : Try enjoying the dropouts and the small resolution you will get from that.

It can't even support HDTV, much less a regular resolution TV stream. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11517538 Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:20:21 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11516794 Tikker_LoS : www.sasktel.com

Offers TV over DSL using ADSL type 1 (not adsl2, not yet anyways)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11516794 Wed, 06 Oct 2004 13:50:20 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515367 Corvus : For delivering TV over DSL you need FFTN, I think it's enough for residential market.
--
Jesus saves, but only Buddha makes incremental backups.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515367 Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:33:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515336 Doctor Olds : DSL will still be too slow and the answer is FTTH. ;)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,11515336 Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:29:07 EDT