| reply to B
Re: NY Times? --- "We would then have to rely on OTHER, less trusted sources to download it, or a fork thereof."
Thats not the same as "No, you can't.", now is it? And why should any other source necessarily be less trusted?
--- "The whole point of Mozilla.org was to have a single branding of the main code branch. If Mozilla.org's reputation is compromised, it harms the progress of Mozilla and Fireweasel as a whole. We have every responsibility to question Mozilla.org's stewardship, exactly because we care about Mozilla."
I agree, this is true, however the Mozilla foundation is quite transparent. No need to speculate and accuse, as any such agenda would be nearly impossible for them to conceal. |
