ceocio
join:2004-04-16
Columbus, OH | So, how does it compare to spybot S &D? So, how does it compare to spybot S &D?.
Guess I don't really need both to eat up my resource..
Looking for opinions from ppl who have actually tested both.. I know many think MS sucks in general, but let's hear some objective opinions regarding this particular product. thanks. |
|
| I really doubt anyone that hates MS will give this product a serious look. I downloaded it, ran it, and it found two items that spysweeper didn't. I ran spysweeper just prior to running the MS product. Take that for what it is worth. I will use it at this point. Even though it is a beta, it seems to run very smoothly and quickly. Hope this helps you decide!! |
|
BPremium,MVM
join:2000-10-28 | reply to ceocio
I think the Giant version did very very (surprisingly) well in Eric Howes' and others' tests. Although it throws a lot of false positives. You can search the security forum here for "Giant AntiSpyware".
Many people who tried it have stopped using it.
-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function |
|
BPremium,MVM
join:2000-10-28 | It seems they will charge for updates.
»it.slashdot.org/it/05/01/06/1521···&tid=109
-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function |
|
ceocio
join:2004-04-16
Columbus, OH | reply to ceocio
ok, i installed it. It found 4 threats. fixed 3 and messed up 1. It f*ked up my flashget install. well, given it's beta, it's stil acceptable.. Hope they'll fix it in official.. |
|
