I'm sorry Karl Bode , but this sounds more like your opinion on the Bill. Obviously you have something against banning Muni's.
The people that support Muni's are probably paying the cities/governments also. Both sides are paying these people to vote their way; it's not just the big bad corporations that pay big $$ for votes. -- Secure-Wifi.Net is now open for buisness in the LA/OC area. MRTG stats on my Linksys WRT54GS
reply to Bill It's labeled op-ed. Don't whine about bias, simply disagree.
quote:The people that support Muni's are probably paying the cities/governments also.
Irrelevant. Only one side of this debate is drafting model legislation, covertly funding bogus stat-farms like the Heartland institute, buying off lawmakers, and changing laws in order to crush their opponent. Give me a break.
Look over on the right....all the longer articles are called "editorial". This site is purely consumer driven. I don't think it makes any pretense to present news from any angle than the pro-consumer position.
In this case consumers clearly don't benefit from having their attempts to wire themselves crushed.
If you want regurgitated pro-bell Press releases, there's plenty of places for you to go.
Have any actual points to make about the logic behind banning community's from improving themselves?
