 TzaleProud Libertarian ConservativePremium join:2004-01-06 NYC Metro | reply to keith2468
Re: USA Top Source Of Spam WorldWide said by keith2468:» news.inq7.net/infotech/index.php···id=22616Dec 28, 2004 quote: US still top source of spam, says Sophos
NEARLY half of all spam spread throughout the world is from the United States, making the country the top spammer of the year, according to a report released by software security firm Sophos.
Sophos report, which lists down the dirty dozen of spam, scored the Can-Spam law signed by US President George W. Bush last year in an attempt to control spam, showing that despite its best efforts, the US is still unable to prevent the spread of unwanted e-mail.
In their report, 42.11 percent of reported spam is from the US followed by South Korea, which is a far second with only 13.43 percent.
... ... ...
And for the previous time period: » informationweek.com/story/showAr···18200812Feb. 26, 2004 quote: * United States, 56.74% * Canada, 6.80% * China (including Hong Kong), 6.24% * South Korea, 5.77% * Netherlands, 2.13% * Brazil, 2.00% * Germany, 1.83% * France, 1.50% * United Kingdom, 1.31% * Australia, 1.21% * Mexico, 1.19% * Spain, 1.05% * Others, 12.23%
This above is based on the IP addresses in the headers of the spam, which often points to infected machines infected by spam trojan or viruses, or machines where the defaults were not customized to keep them secure and prevent them being used as open mail relays. If you look at what is advertised in the spam -- to see the true source of the spam -- you can do that yourself and see what products and services are advertised in the spam you receive. Of course a US mortgage company can set up an web server in China to evade US anti-spamming laws. But you know if it is a mortgage company looking for mortgagees in the USA, it is licensed in the USA. And the same will be true if I ever get solicited for a mortgages on a Canadian, Polish, Chinese, or Nigerian houses. With stuff like that there is a 99% tip-off as to where the spammer really is based. Not enough SPAM comes from Europe to warrant ANY censoring of an ISP. Sure, if there is an ISP putting out TONS AND TONS of SPAM it could be justified, but the liberal banning they are doing of European ISP's is unjustified. If anything they should focus on American ISP's. The thing is they KNOW that if they BAN AMERICAN ISP's they will receive HELL because in any given area there is someone who will know someone that uses that ISP in the domestic U.S.A.
So don't ban the world because it's "easy" to get rid of a few % of SPAM, start banning the USA and stop acting afraid that you will lose profit because of it... You know the minority use e-mail to Europe, but the majority use domestic e-mail. They know if they do the right thing (target American ISP's) they will lose profit from pissed off customers more than European e-mailers.
Corporate greed runs America. Welcome to America, can I have your credit card?
-Tzale -- "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security."--Benjamin Franklinhttp://www.megaherz.com |