<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Extra Cost? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12539194</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:06:58 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:06:58 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Extra Cost?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12559027</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/356174"><b>tiger72</b></A> : it has nothing to do with AOL for Broadband. Just go to rr.com and on the sidebar at the bottom there's a link that says "AOL". That's where all the content is.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12559027</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 09:59:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extra Cost?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12541287</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/162762"><b>djrobx</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>Holy St. Francis! $54 per month? What for, what do you get for that type of money and who would pay for that?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>I think he means AOL Broadband (AOL DSL).  It was available around the time when virtually all of the telephone companies were selling DSL for $49 per month. It used a proprietary protocol.   You could not easily use a wireless router, connect a game system, or anything like that.   And it was buggy stuff.  I was trying to support an XP system which simply could not run the newest version of their proprietary stack without crashing.  Why on earth weren't they using standard PPPoE?  <br><br>As a tech I understand why lots of people like AOL.  I thought the idea of AOL DSL should have been a smash hit.  But there was no way in hell I could recommend that service.  Enabling connectivity only through the AOL frontend was a disaster.  Even the most non-technical people I deal with end up wanting to use a wireless router to connect a laptop up or something later and it was clear the AOL service would preclude that.  BYOA plus broadband was the only thing I could reasonably recommend.  <br><br>Later they started offering a proprietary router, and then shortly after that, enabled PPPoE access, so AOL Broadband users could finally start using their service like a real broadband connection.   Around this time DSL prices were falling like a rock, so BYOA actually became cheaper.  But all of this happened what seemed like minutes before they announced that they would no longer be offering service.  Of course, AOL then decides to raise prices of both dialup and BYOA.   I watched a lot of people "learn to live without", facilitated by AOL's very own instant messenger service.   Increasing the price of dialup service at this stage of the game is just ludicrous.<br><br>Using TWC to usher their dialup customers to cable sounds like a great idea, but I'm sure they'll find some other massive way to shoot themselves in the foot. I just pray that it doesn't come in the form of ruining their well respected Road Runner service, which so far has been amazingly unscathed by AOL's tentacles.   <br><SMALL>--<br>\\ROB - a part of the SCB local network</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12541287</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:46:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extra Cost?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12539418</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1114057"><b>AtomicZero</b></A> :  <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Matt <A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>If you remember, "AOL for Broadband" was like $54.95 and was much less capable. <br><br>If you currently have Road Runner and want to add AOL's Bring Your Own Access plan, well, that's another $14.95. Totally ridiculous IMHO. It should be maybe $4.95/month for their BYOA plan. </DIV> Holy St. Francis! $54 per month? What for, what do you get for that type of money and who would pay for that? If you already had broadband/cable access that would be a total waste. But I do like you idea for the BYOA I think that should be more than reasonable, especially if you are using TW Cable.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12539418</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:09:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Extra Cost?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12539360</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><b>Karl Bode</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>Perhaps this is AOL and Time Warner realizing that and lowering the price for people who wish to remain on AOL?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>They simply want to migrate their dial-up base (read: advertising cash cow) to broadband, and it has taken them YEARS to realize that working closely with a broadband provider <B>they own</B> is a way to do that.....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12539360</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:00:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Extra Cost?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12539194</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><b>Matt</b></A> : It looks as though this will be either an add-on service, or a service targeting former AOL Dial-Up users.<br><br>It doesn't sound like they are going to force anything on the normal RR users.<br><br>If you remember, "AOL for Broadband" was like $54.95 and was much less capable. <br><br>If you currently have Road Runner and want to add AOL's Bring Your Own Access plan, well, that's another $14.95. Totally ridiculous IMHO. It should be maybe $4.95/month for their BYOA plan.<br><br>Perhaps this is AOL and Time Warner realizing that and lowering the price for people who wish to remain on AOL?<br><br>I could see parents purchasing that for their children, while offering an unfiltered pipe for mom and dad.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12539194</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 09:38:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
