site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


sbrook
Premium,Mod
join:2001-12-14
Ottawa
kudos:4

reply to BTVSFan

Re: hmmmm

That's all very well, but they also run the risk of courts martial for conduct unbecoming if they do pursue such cases.


BTVSFan
New And Improved
Premium
join:2003-09-06
USA

1 edit

said by sbrook:


That's all very well, but they also run the risk of courts martial for conduct unbecoming if they do pursue such cases.
Not ture... nothing in the AR 670-1 about downloading music.

Maybe yes if on a government computer, but not if you are using your own personal computer.

»www4.army.mil/ocpa/read.php?stor···key=5878

The military (At least Army) has some concerns due to security, but only on THIER computers. Nothing about soldiers personnel computers.


DooD

join:2002-02-10
Jacksonville, FL

reply to sbrook
I'm no JAG, but I do know that we still have to obey all laws and regulations mandated by federal law. Therefore, by violating any copyright law we would be held accountable much like anyone else. However, Article 134 of the UCMJ is the beloved "catch-all" - the General Article. So merely being involved in such a case could get you a court martial under at least this article for "crimes that discredit the armed forces."



DadeMurphy
Premium
join:2002-07-25
Danvers, MA

1 edit

None of these suits are criminal suits, they are all civil suits. You're not breaking any law by receiving pirated music, you are being sued.

Check out This comment



amasa
Surrender Your Women

join:2001-09-28
New York, NY

reply to BTVSFan
AR670-1 is "Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia"

LOL, Get a haircut and stop downloading music!


Sunday, 27-May 13:03:26 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics