<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Latency and Interleaving in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12625</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:22:55 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:22:55 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Latency and Interleaving</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12625</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/121165"><b>TenYardFight</b></A> : Defanitely(sp?) very interesting.  What about us Covad customers that signed up for ADSL service and recieved SDSL modems because this was all they were set up for?  I signed up for 384/128 but during nice conditions I have seen it send at just under 300Kb/s, averaging around 250Kb/s.<br><br>I get 30ms to my first hop.  This is not that bad considering my first hop is physically located in Wash DC and I am in Boston.  Of course 10ms would be better :).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12625</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2000 22:28:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latency and Interleaving</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12267</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1"><b>justin</b></A> : The information available is vague. I'm hoping some tech types might contribute. Fast-path vs interleaving are options on the Cisco 675 ADSL home router ..<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/dsl_prod/c600s/c677/677inop/04chap04.htm" >www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc&middot;&middot;&middot;ap04.htm</A> indicates this, but there is no sign interleaving can be disabled, or checked for, on other brands of home ADSL equipment.<br>Since closed boxes rely on the remote DSLAM for their settings, Interleaving may be a rollout choice of the DSL network and not user selectable.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12267</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2000 17:16:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Latency and Interleaving</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12225</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><b>Karl Bode</b></A> : So wait, after reading this little blurb again, it states that you cannot change the interleave setting at the CO?  I thought you could swap this to "Fast-Path" mode??]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12225</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2000 13:26:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
