<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Adaware? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12666660</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:15:33 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:15:33 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Adaware?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12667006</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1095138"><b>OceanaJones</b></A> : If a ad ware product meets certain criteria IE authorized installs,no added spy ware, and can be easily removed using add/remove programs, then it should be de-listed. Then you just have to make sure you know what you are downloading to your computer. As long as the user is given a choice before or during installation of software that has bundled ad ware, there should be no problem and the people that make these ad ware/spy ware removal programs can concentrate on the serious threats like the new CWS infections. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12667006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:49:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Adaware?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12666660</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/648025"><b>Goldman</b></A> : Something stinks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12666660</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:49:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Adaware?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12666632</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/801002"><b>Plldwnyrpnts</b></A> : Really?<br><br>edit: Just read the post.  OH WOW!  I guess shady business is shady business no matter what side you're on.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12666632</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:43:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
