1 edit | Just another reason to shoot all the lawyers Just one more reason to, as Shakespeare said, shoot all the lawyers. When a company makes an illegitimate worthless product and sees that it may lose money when people realize it, they sue everyone in sight to save their bacon. When will the US court system put a stake thru the heart of these firms and their crooked lawyers.
My Web Page
My Blog
Join Red Room Forum |
|
| Agreed. Isn't this against the freedom of press? |
|
| What press? Are you asking the right question?
I'm not sure there is a constitutional right that would be violated. |
|
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
no reason to shoot lawyers, what about the clowns abusing your judicial system i.e. corporations. Also what about the clowns who exploit the public under the blanket of capitalism i.e. whenU and others. Get rid of them permanently and the problem wi' stop for good. |
|
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
said by fAcEtIOUs:Just one more reason to, as Shakespeare said, shoot all the lawyers. Well, he didn't say shoot, he said kill. And, why do we need another reason? There are already too many reasons. They have legal degrees and have been admitted to the state bar.
 |
|
 UnKownThe Underground Network
join:2002-09-08
Orlando, FL | reply to Plldwnyrpnts
Im allowed to say the presidents a moron, why cant i say this is spyware?
You as a viewer of my web site dont have to beleive me. |
|
 sweintzPremium
join:2002-03-01
Chester, CT | Not only that, but the dumb lawyers have to redefine what spyware is (away from the accepted definition -- ie: anything that sends info on what url's are being accessed to a central server somewhere) is in order to claim they are not spyware. It doesn't need a third party server involved to be spyware, contrary to what Mark D. Hopkins asserts. |
|
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
Lawyers don't sue people, people sue people.
Besides, if we outlaw lawyers, only outlaws will have lawyers. |
|
