<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: So what&#x27;s this got to do with Vint Cerf? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r12799806</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:19:17 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:19:17 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: So what&#x27;s this got to do with Vint Cerf?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12800061</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/692101"><b>fantomposter</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Karl Bode <A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>:</SMALL><BR><BR>No, though I'm not sure it makes sense, anti-spammers have been slamming Cerf as well.<br> </DIV>Not debating or giving you a hard time. Just explaining 'our' position on this issue.<br><br>MCI has been hosting Send-Safe for about two years. Playing nice was not working. Anything and anyone at MCI are fair game after 2 years, imho. Their paycheck was, in part, paid for by Send-Safe. Always keep in mind we are talking about the number one spam producing network in the world.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12800061</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:17:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: So what&#x27;s this got to do with Vint Cerf?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12799946</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/156437"><b>dave</b></A> : Thanks, Karl - that's a useful part of the story.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12799946</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:59:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: So what&#x27;s this got to do with Vint Cerf?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12799811</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/732594"><b>ronpin</b></A> : Irony my friend...irony (geesh)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12799811</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:34:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: So what&#x27;s this got to do with Vint Cerf?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12799806</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><b>Karl Bode</b></A> : Yes!  Just name dropping because we're such Prima donna fashionistas! ;)<br><br>No, though I'm not sure it makes sense, anti-spammers have been slamming Cerf as well.  Some even suggested filing a formal complaint against Cerf with the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), who recently gave him the Turing award.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://spamkings.oreilly.com/archives/2005/02/protest_brewing.html" >spamkings.oreilly.com/archives/2&middot;&middot;&middot;ing.html</A><br><br>Added the link to the write-up.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12799806</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:34:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>So what&#x27;s this got to do with Vint Cerf?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12799768</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/156437"><b>dave</b></A> : I saw no mention of him in the article, and according to the DSLR writeup, his only offence seems to be to be employed by MCI.<br><br>He may well be involved in all this, but nothing you've written here indicates one way or another. Simply name dropping?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12799768</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:29:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
