 hdmanFlt RiderPremium
join:2003-11-25
Appleton, WI
 ·exede by ViaSat
| Why squabble? I see a LOT of squabbling in the early part of this thread about Comcast versus SBC. Let me put things in perspective for you...
There are still MANY people out there, like me, who would give a left (and probably right) nut to have cable or DSL available to them. Say what you want about Comcast or SBC being bad or otherwise, but I would pay $150 per month for either...period.
I will most likely end up on a satellite service in the coming months, but again, cheerish what you have....
HDMan |
|
 oliphantI Have 8 BoobiesPremium
join:2004-11-26
Corona, CA | So I'm assuming you would consider $20 to be a smokin' deal. |
|
 Ark
join:2002-06-08
Ada, MI
 ·Comcast
| reply to hdman
I know what you mean. I know a few people (2 at least) in MI that can't get cable for TV even, and their ILEC is Verizon, with no plans for DSL. One of them goes without internet access, while the other uses DirecWay Satellite! Ouch.
It seems everybody who can get SBC or Comcast can usually pick which one they want, since both are offered there.
Poor rural users, getting screwed again. |
|
